
Once a client hits a certain age, the pops drop. So less work for the same pay on the providers end. Maybe I'm wrong, but in my case I noticed when I hit a certain age MSOG occurs less and less because the thrill is gone after the first and junior doesn't respond the same.
I'm curious to know people's take on this, both provider and hobbyist perspective welcome.
I've always found it slightly odd, but I guess I can see the logic if there is a real problem with immaturity among men of a certain age. But isn't that painting with kind of a broad brush, assuming the client has references, does screening, etc.?
What is the reason for this? Does it suggest something in particular about a provider, her attitude toward what she does, or her other expectations?
The reason I ask, is because there's a provider I'm interested in seeing who has an age minimum. I'm less than two years below the required age. I figured I'd email her and see if she'd make an exception, and if not, whatever. But I'm also wondering whether it's kinda a red flag?
Anyway, interested to hear anyone's thoughts.
that she has an age minimum. Its usually not an arbitrary number, but rather based on her own experiences with younger customers. The numbers I most often see on provider websites are 30 and 35 for minimums. There are other providers, mostly 20-somethings, who have age MAXIMUMS, but every once in awhile I will see a 30 year-old provider advertise that she doesn't see guys under 35.
My advice is, unless you are planning on handing over your ID to a woman you don't know, just tell her you're the age that she wants. Unless you look 10 years younger than you really are, once she see you, I doubt she would say anything. This may sound dishonest, but nine times out of ten, I can guarantee you that SHE is not the age she told you, either, so fudging up or down a little is part of the game for everyone in P4P. Lol
Seriously, who can read someone else's mind and reasoning? It is hidden to us unless she says why she has set that limit.
She decides and sets her rules. You really have two choices:
* Move on to a provider with different rules;
* Try to see if she will be flexible in her rules and see you.
I'd hazard a guess that maturity of mind and behavior underlies a minimum age limit. Arguing to see her despite her rules might belie the maturity of mind she desires... not saying it could not be done, but to succeed I'm guessing it would have to be artfully done.
Just my humble 0.02
I have no problem meeting anyone's age minimum these days. But there have been discussions on the boards about general screening parameters, whether it be age, ethnicity, or length x girth. Each provider sets and modifies her own rules, but the feeling is that age requirements are to screen for mature, gentlemanly behavior. If mature, polite emails or phone calls are reassuring, she might relax a 35 yo minimum to 33 or 30 or whatever her bank balance allows.
.
Some Asian providers have rules about seeing ONLY Asian clients and some have rules about NOT seeing Asian clients. I think the former requirement is to ensure a language and cultural match (e.g., Chinese - Chinese). The latter is thought to be due to the closeness of some K-town or C-town communities in large cities. A K-girl who lives in Queens (NYC) and works in Manhattan (NYC) doesn't want to risk bumping into a Queens neighbor BCD in Manhattan so she simply says, "No Koreans." I would only guess that if a K-client convinced a K-hostess that he is from out of town or doesn't risk much of any other friend or family overlap that she might agree to meet him.
.
Contrary to the other opinions, I suggest being more truthful about your age. Many people have an impression of themselves that is not shared by others (e.g., Dunning-Kruger effect). YOU might think you have the maturity of someone much older than you are but what does SHE expect of her 35+ visitors? You might think you can fool her easily but she might recognize a behavior that is typical of the kind of guy she does NOT want to be with. If you can convince her of your maturity rather than your (fake) age, I think you'll be much better off.
.
Good luck!
I'm curious to know people's take on this, both provider and hobbyist perspective welcome.
I've always found it slightly odd, but I guess I can see the logic if there is a real problem with immaturity among men of a certain age. But isn't that painting with kind of a broad brush, assuming the client has references, does screening, etc.?
What is the reason for this? Does it suggest something in particular about a provider, her attitude toward what she does, or her other expectations?
The reason I ask, is because there's a provider I'm interested in seeing who has an age minimum. I'm less than two years below the required age. I figured I'd email her and see if she'd make an exception, and if not, whatever. But I'm also wondering whether it's kinda a red flag?
Anyway, interested to hear anyone's thoughts.
meaning "No Blacks Allowed." Others don't want to see guys ABOVE a certain age. It's called discrimination. And while we abhor that in every other profession, this service is selling the most intimate activity available. Which gives them the right to discriminate.
meaning "No Blacks Allowed." Others don't want to see guys ABOVE a certain age. It's called discrimination. And while we abhor that in every other profession, this service is selling the most intimate activity available. Which gives them the right to discriminate.
So a companion's comfort-level is a valid reason for denying service.
Plenty of companions (especially mature-category companions like myself) are uncomfortable with younger gentlemen.
I've tried. I don't like being intimate with someone closer to my children's age than my own. It makes me feel awkward and on-edge.
I haven't been able to overcome that. Because of it, younger men will not get the same experience from me that older men do. That wouldn't be fair to them and yes..... I just don't like doing appointments with them so I no longer do.
So I don't consider that to be "discrimination" as it has nothing to do with my preconceived ideas or opinions about them.
I actually don't disagree with anything you say here, except to point out that my use of the word "discrimination" was intended to be more along the lines of definition #2 below, not #1. I think it's pretty clear I did NOT suggest I thought it was "unjust."
dis·crim·i·na·tion
/dəˌskriməˈnāSH(ə)n/
Learn to pronounce
See definitions in:
All
Psychology
Electronics
noun
noun: discrimination; plural noun: discriminations
1.
the unjust or prejudicial treatment of different categories of people or things, especially on the grounds of race, age, or sex.
"victims of racial discrimination"
2.
recognition and understanding of the difference between one thing and another.
one of my favs has a 50 minimum (no problem for me!). I asked her why, and she said she likes the maturity of older guys (she’s mid-50s). She’s grandfathered a couple guys she’s seen for a long time who’re under 50, but otherwise she holds to it.
grandmothered her in as well. Lol
who doesn’t look anywhere near her age.
And if you love that (and it seems you think it’s a big yuk), I know a 60-ish provider who IS a GILF and who puts most 25 year olds to shame with her sleek, strong bod.
my sweet spot for age is 35-45. They must not look MILFY, though. Slender and fit will draw me in anytime. I have not yet met a 60-ish provider who meets this standard, but I have seen some in their 50's. One was reviewed, not by me, and the profiler put her age at 31-35. and she could easily pass for it in the dimmed light of the incall. The "yuk" for me is not the age, its the wrinkles, saggy skin and lack of muscle tone that USUALLY goes with a 60's age. If she keeps herself in shape and can pass for younger, then I do not have a number where I say, "yuk."
Are you comfortable revealing the two mature providers you mention in this thread? PM me if you prefer. Thanks
Age restrictions are not uncommon in this industry.
Some women don’t like the immaturity. Some don’t like the youthful stamina. Others don’t like the cougar vibe.
Similar to older guys not wanting to see younger ladies, many older ladies do not want to see younger guys for the same reasons. Have kids that age. Feel creepy. Nothing in common. Cannot relate. Clients below a certain age tend to be less responsible and more likely to flake. Furthermore, older guys are usually more likely to be one and done yet still prefer longer engagements. They also tend to have more disposable income and are more likely to want companionship vs. getting off as many times as possible in as short of an appointment as possible.
Once a client hits a certain age, the pops drop. So less work for the same pay on the providers end. Maybe I'm wrong, but in my case I noticed when I hit a certain age MSOG occurs less and less because the thrill is gone after the first and junior doesn't respond the same.
Lots of girls fake their age.
Whatever her reason is ... its her reason. This may be a business but it's still a very intimate business and providers and hobbyists have the right to see who they want regardless of donation amount. As hobbyists you decide who you want to see and as providers we have the same right and shouldnt be judged for it.
Personally I have an age limit of 30/35 because not all but most men of a younger age usually feel that when they come to see me that its some kind of porno audition and they have something to prove. They think its about one thing and thats all. Now is this true for every guy under 30 ... No, but its been true in my personal experience and I am a GFE provider not PSE. Can i be PSE yes but also if my date is GFE.
Just my 2 cents xoxoxo
.
You don't seem to have any reviews yet, but that's another way that Providers can screen us for our behavior and maturity. It is more fine tuned that a chronological age. Mentioned by others: Some younger guys have a porn star attitude, stamina and wall to wall expectations. Some older guys are more interested in the overall experience and not completing a check list of things to do ... twice in 30 minutes. Reviews are an insight into that.
.
Some mentioned that their age limits are more about chronological age. Some "older" guys are still being carded in their 30s - 40s and some "younger" guys look older than their years. Pre-meeting inquiries almost never discuss sexual details, but you and she might be able to figure out the meaning of her preferences more subtly.
.
Good luck! Have fun!

She's looking for a well polished, refined gentleman. She wants the date to be an experience and not just a hit and run thing. Personally, from where I see it, it helps me in deciding and it's only a plus.
It seems to be a mature woman thing as who wants be bed down with a guy close to her son's age....creepy, no?
and has her hopes dashed once again. lol
Sorry hpy, I honestly couldn't help myself. I tried not to make this post, but my fingers acted like they had a mind of their own and the next thing I knew I was hitting the "post message" tab.
Then in your head...lol.
Now that's my brain thinking...lol...carry on
I have more brains in my pinky than many of the posters have in their heads, but of course I suppose it depends on which head we are talking about. lol
Back to age minimums, it's not just the older gals with minimum age requirements, I see a lot of younger girls who don't want to be entertaining guys below a certain age and who also have age minimums of 30-35 years old.
Agreed! Being an old dinosaur, I've been turned down by women who don't see clients above a certain age. No problem (as long as I know that beforehand) and I just move on to another provider.
There are MANY reasons why people choose to see, or NOT see, others in this most intimate of services.
Not everyone is for everybody.
Just accept that and find someone who is more compatible.
Buena suerte!
So if all these young guys hear this guy out, then they might decide to leave the confines of their mom's basement. Those that made a few bucks just might want to finally get laid..I'm feeling a boom coming soon ladies....Keep an open mind and think outside the box here, Work with me on this...so huh, you feeling it? C'om now....lol