I am wondering how frequently do you see a women who truly look as gorgeous as her Glamor shots?

I have often seen escort's pictures that makes look as good as super models. Of the couple of women I have been with only 1 has come close to their best pictures.

Honestly, I prefer women who dressed / makeup-ed to the tilt which maybe part of my disappointment.

The one provider that I have met that looked as good as her images was Victoria Lane. Victoria has an amazing set of images. She told me that she has received many compliments from other providers about the quality of her images.

quite a few actually..they always look better sans clothing..

The higher level and therefore higher priced girls almost always as good as their pics.   The cracked out BP girls are another story.  You do have to keep in mind camera angles on "curvier girls".   And there are always one of 2 reasons a girl hides her face.  1.  Legitimate discretion or 2. She gets more business hiding her face than showing it.

The same percentage as models/movie stars.

as their pro shots.

The irony is at the time most of these 30% were using candid unedited photos which made them look better in person than their actual pictures.

I discovered that she was a model in real life. There were hundreds of glamour shots on the net. Some looked good, some not so much so I was on the fence. Then one day I ran into her on the subway. I was fucking floored and contacted her the next day to set up an appt.

many others look close. But then it's a glamour shot and this whole thing is a fantasy. If you read the reviews, many hobbyists will comment on the pics. Many times I take my cue from those comments. BTW I've seen many providers who obscure their face, and most of the time, I've been pleased as well.  

She has a gorgeous face but she blurs her photos.  I guess anyone would look better than a big blur, but she is a stunning woman.

-- Modified on 3/19/2013 10:41:29 AM

For all we know, they don't look that great when they are raw and real. Isn't The whole point of "glamour" photography to make the subject is, no matter who, male or female, look fantastic. Maybe even better than in person? Some people are more photogenic than others too.

I have met a few providers that looked much better in person than their photos.

By the way, if you are choosing a higher tier provider, you can request their look and dress for your session and will likely get just what you ask for. $150 BP-only girl? Not so much.

Of the handful of high priced girls I have seen, 500/hr and up, none lived up to their pics. They were all attractive, gave good service, but were much more average in appearance than the photos would have me believe.
That's been my experience.

I look the same as long as I have a tan and hair extensions in. I think Kera Harris, Taylor Moore, and Jinni Minx, all look better than the photos on the net...especially Taylor and Jinni because they just used regular candid shots to start with. Kera has some really nice photos, but she looks just like them.

Joi is stunning in person.   I hope to reconnect with her someday

Thank you M123, but when guys tell me I look better in person, I don't get it.  I paid good money to look my BEST.  Good lighting, professional make-up, profession hair, etc.  

Personally, I think I look better in my photos.  You certainly don't want to put up bad photos or ones that make you look worse.  

I try to always dress to the 9's and fix up (as they say in the south) "real pretty" when I'm on a date, but my photos are my "calling card" and I want them to look good too.

Often when a guy tells me I look much better than my photos, I realize his blood must have left his big head and traveled south.  Either that or they are telling me lies to flatter me. - And as I said in another thread, I respond well to flattery.

These professionals know how to bring out the best features in a woman; the best lighting, camera angles, makeup, clothes, etc. Any lady would be hard pressed to look 100% like that for every date.
I'm happy with at least 90% relative to these "ideal" photos. I mean the ladies are still beautiful but I don't expect them to measure up to their glamour shots.
On the other hand, the ladies that don't use "glamour shots" are often at least as good or even better looking than their photos that were not done by one of the glamour photogs.

I think Dodda is a good example of a lady that lives up to her pics.

I always take that as a compliment, lol. I am often told I look better in person... but then I have never taken "glamor" shots... they are all taken with my digital camera & put up without any re-touching. I think when people meet you in person, it's not just the looks.. they are now also receiving your personality, your smile in person, etc.. & that only adds to a women's attractiveness.

totally agree..Dodda can give the camera a boner..i love Swedes..

I seek out ladies with natural good looks and amateur candid photos. I have rately been disappointed.

best of all is of course nathalie harper.  she's gorgeous and actually prettier in real life than her pix.

the long lost eyva ferrari was super hot in real life, but alas, she's retired (and really retired, not escort-retired-coming back-in-two-months-retired).

lela cruz is also soooo hot in real life, she's as pretty as her pix (esp. her ass, altho her face is lovely, too!  no butter face here!)

sadie joy is, as her name implies, a joy to have next to you in bed.  such a hot bod, and very very happy to please you!

melody memoirs is even hotter in real life than in her pix, tho her pix are pretty sexy.

and tho we didn't click, maria melana was also incredibly beautiful.

never had the pleasure of her intimate company but i have met serena rossi and she's just as gorgeous as her pix.

dude you gotta know where to look, and how to read between the lines of both the ads and the reveiws.

I can't wait to judge for myself!

incredibly beautiful" but you scored her a 7 as in "attractive". Id think "incredibly beautiful" is better than attractive, so did you score her as attractive b/c you didn't click? Im not criticizing how you score, I'm just trying to understand if not clicking decreases the appearance or performance score or it depends on the man, I guess.

Interesting.

-- Modified on 3/19/2013 5:07:37 PM

Hi London,

Oh to be in Florida now that I know Jinni Minx is there!!  Perfect body type, bush!! whats not to like??

If you men me, no I'm not, lol. I just believe I have been one of the ladies the gentleman who mentioned her has seen. However, he could have only been considering those with super glamour photos, which I wouldn't consider mine to be. Although I do have some professional photos, they're not really glamour photos since they're not airbrushed or Photoshopped and my makeup and hair was how I wore it everyday at the time. I was just busting his chops, lol.

Good point, and only further reiterates my post above. Who the fk knocks a girl on looks because of her ability to click? That's a performance or attitude issue, not a physical one.

-- Modified on 3/20/2013 4:43:53 PM

i'm lucky if i get anything more than a "great see you then!" response to my request for an appointment.

i wish women would take time to let their personalities show in correspondence with me in this hobby.  it would save me a lot of wasted time and money on unsatisfying encounters.