will someone give me a template for writing enough explicit details? I have had providers complain to me about being too specific, and I have seen some reviews that told you absolutely nothing, and somehow I had another one rejected. Are the details only specific if they are abbreviated? In my latest (not yet approved) I spoke about positions, protection, number of rounds, kissing, her appearance and attitude. What more do I need? The last time I had one rejected for this reason, I just added a line at the bottom listing abbreviations of what occurred, and it was approved. Is that the solution? Do those who approve them just look for this, and not actually read what is in the review?

I mean, entirely apart from the tackiness of it?

As long as your review is accurate, and truthful, that's what counts. Next thing you know, they will want to write the review for you.  

-- Modified on 10/19/2007 5:13:09 PM

I do it is because TER has asked for more xplicit info on ones I've submitted and I'd like them to see the original.

that approve/disapprove reviews.  Some might be more lenient than others.  In the past, I have had several reviews disapproved initially only to add some more detail and viola, it gets approved.

I've had several rejected for not enough explicit details. Like you say, everything that happened was in the narrative, nothing I could really add to it. So I just e-mailed staff asking for clarification and they got approved as is. Sometimes you just need a second set of eyes to read it, and I think that's what happens when you question why it wasn't approved.

that you cannot be respectful of an SPs request not to be too detailed.  Unless the lady has done something negative, a less explicit review hurts no one.

xoxox
Anik

The last one I did that on I wrote to staff "From this review, I'm not sure if he even held her hand."

I don't need to know every graphic detail but I need to know if I would be willing to spend time and money on a lady.

There are some reviews that are so bad that you never even know if the guy spent the evening looking into a civilian date's eyes over dinner or if he paid for an escort.

but I think it might get more exposure here. I have a similar complaint as you:


Ok, so I have issues (to some degree) with those short ass essays.

I realize any information is better than no information, but the spread of quality is huge and it would be nice if TER could establish some kind of quality tiers (or something to that matter).

Some reviews are barely evolved beyond the caveman drawings on some walls. In extreme cases the reviews are something like "I came in. Looks hot. We 69, then mish, k9, and cum. say buy, nice time. recommend!!!!"

Compared to some reviews that go into great detail of how the atmosphere was, what exactly happened, how the provider performed each act, made the reviewer feel, etc, etc. I feel I am not only missing information on my part, but also feel bad for the people who write good and long reviews as that can take quite some time.

I am not suggesting spelling or grammar checks or anything (Though some of you people PLEASE PLEASE learn how to use PARAGRAPHS!!! A huge blob of text doesn't read very good). I also don't suggest  punishments for "not so informative" reviews" but rather a reward for good ones.

Writing a good review doesn't take a HUGE amount of time, but I would like the person to actually put some thought into it beyond the "Yes, we fucky fucky"

Its a little science, a little art and some black magic.  There isn't anyway to quantify provider reviewing.  I still get rejected on at least 1 out of 10 times.

Related Gratuitous Assage Hero Photo

OFF

LOL

To be honest, I made the mistake of contacting a provider through TER messaging. So, she knew who I was, therefore, that was the one and only complaint about explicitness that I was referring to. I don't tell providers that I review unless they ask, and I certainly don't give out my screen name. In that one girl's defense, after re-reading my review, it probably was too graphic. I agree with you that seeing someone, and telling then you will write a review, is tacky.

that some reviews are just copy/pastes with a few words changed.

5/10/15 days for a review, depending on content, would probably raise the level. After all, if it were just about 'initials' (DATY, BJ, BBBJ, CIM, # of cups, etc), TER could easily just add all of those as check-boxes. Since they're not, it does seem they want more, even if bare-bones reviews do get approved.

juicy but not tacky...  The graphic description of bbbj, daty and all positions is somehow distasteful  and degrading to the provider.. However, for fellow hobbyists, whom the review is for, lets not lose sight of that, they need to know what the lady is all about..  YOu would think the real juicy reviews would help the provider wouldn't you?  When I read reviews of someone I'm interested in and see all those graphic details, I'm dialing the number !!!