Everything contained in this site is a work of fiction that is published for entertainment and amusement purposes only. The reviews are stories that have been submitted by users of The Erotic Review.

No, but If I'm interested in a lady, I will read 5 to 10 reviews and get a overall idea of how she operates and if that aligns with my wants and needs, I proceed accordingly.  

I think its been this way since the start. Nothing new.

but I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

This statement is a little bold, in my opinion. I believe the majority of reviewers intend to convey at least some legitimate information about their session with a provider. We can debate whether the majority is 50% or 80%. However, I also think a high percentage of even the legitimate reviewers add elements of fantasy to their reviews, often aggrandizing their prowess and skills. There are 8,400 reviewers online for a reason - the site adds value so everything on it can’t be fantasy! There’s nothing wrong with a little truth and a little fiction when I’m contemplating my next sexual conquest!! Also. It’s fun to sift through the nuggets to find the truth!

Dont get me started on the appearance scores

There have been a few very highly rated providers that I have been somewhat disappointed with, while I have been thrilled with providers that have modest scores.  

I highly doubt anyone believes everything. First, these are point of view pieces. Second, people embellish. But, to say they are published only for entertainment and amusement diminishes everything this aite is about. And frankly, that’s false. I’m a bit surprised that someone who has preached about getting business from TER would basically make a statement that suggests the site is a joke. I suppose that means there is no truth or useful information in your reviews QB?

Like some of these guys saying they made a provider cum 6 times in an hour long session or that they have to carry their wee-wee's around in a wheelbarrow?
Nah........

That statement is written by lawyers for obvious reasons, but it should lead everyone to take what they read with a large grain of salt.

but if her reviews are consistent across ten or so, I tend to believe it. My experience has born this out.

Regardless of what's real and what's fantasy, I think the biggest issue with reviews is the ratings, especially in looks.
A 10 in looks is completely absurd and so is the concept of it's all subjective. Here's something that's objective. A 10 in looks means you are one of the most beautiful women in the world. And if that's the case I'd consider all you 10's should get off your knees and head to NY or LA and become a movie star or fashion model where you'll end up making more in a day than you make in a year. This would also include a 9. Do you ever think Gigi Hadad, or Margot Robbie or Charlize Theron ever think "hmm maybe I should try being a hooker instead?" Personally I don't think those three are 10's but certainly a 9. The highest ranked providers here are probably a 6 or 7 especially when you're dealing with over produced and often AI manipulated photos and the level of cheap plastic surgery, especially butt lifts and over inflated monster tits. I get it some guys enjoy those hard round balloons but I must be a freak because I prefer a natural woman and therefore prefer the 30-40ish range. I'm absolutely guilty of overrating out of some false duty to protect the woman's feelings. Unfortunately this is apparently the case for most reviewers (the real reviews anyway). I've certainly seen some sexy providers and at best I'd say a handful of 8's. I have also walked into an apartment and I'm greeted by a 60 year old overweight woman that has all 9's and 10's and looks nothing like her pics, in that case I will always walk. I know many men here are into the MILFS AND GILFS but if I walk in and see a provider that reminds me of my grandma I'm walking.  
To be clear I'm a solid 5 not bad at 70 haha. TER is very very rarely reliable anymore from my experience. If a 300 lb 52 y.o can get a 9 or 10 in looks this place has been had. As for these boards that I usually avoid, has become nothing more than XXX twitter or a sexual Instagram, two places I wouldn't be caught dead signing up for. These BS debates between people you don't know and will probably never meet is the epitome of SUBJECTIVE. As I said before on Miss Scarlet is the only one here that's right about EVERYTHING so just check in with her.  

What was your question my dear? I am always willing to help the elderly navigate their golden years. Do you need help signing up for a Medicare supplement policy? Or Meals on Wheels in your area? If you want me to confirm you are a solid 5 in looks department I will be more than happy to evaluate for you!  

i ignore both the highest and the lowest review ratings and look for a trend.   Also not just numbers but lady's attitude or/and particular skills.  

I believe that many providers O 5 times per session because their clients are so good at sex.
I believe all the guys who claim they knock out three or 4 shots in an hour.  
I believe that a lady who listed her age as "30s" in her initial profile 20 years ago is still in her 30s.
I believe that, despite the going rate in LA being 7-800, that absolute doll with no reviews who's advertising a 400 rate is real.
I believe that the pictures on every ad and website are an accurate representation of the lady, despite being > 10 years old in some cases.
I believe that if we men just band together, we can drive prices down to 2001 rates.
I believe Bigfoot ate my unicorn while riding Nessie, just before they were both abducted by a UFO.

-- Modified on 1/4/2026 5:28:39 PM

I thought you were going to recite the apostle's creed there for a sec.

I could believe it and the conclude you're just a fiction and if I ever sent a deposit it would be wasted money.

Does this mean all the 10/10 reviews for the Thread Starter are fictional?  

-- Modified on 1/5/2026 3:02:30 PM

-- Modified on 1/5/2026 3:20:59 PM

Let us suppose that "Everything contained in this site is a work of fiction that is published for entertainment and amusement purposes only" is a true statement.

Do you believe your own reviews?