: New review crapshoot : Discussion in TER General Board, posted by John

2,069,493 Total Reviews 3,853 New Reviews

21,454 Users Online

TER General Board

Tree
Flat

New review crapshoot

John_Laroche 963 reads

posted 4 years ago

This post may become obsolete soon, but if you check out New Reviews in San Diego, there are TWO first reviews of the same kGirl named Dandan. Is she short, late 20s with a B cup and using real pics, or average height with C cups and using photoshopped pics?

Is she slender or athletic? Are they real or implants?

All rhetorical questions of course. The system is perfect as is.

36363jensen4 years ago91 reads

A true pro

She can be a different woman to different men. Skilled

Or maybe just the usual lack of attention to details by guys.

But, I don't get how the reviews got approved as I thought the ad link needed to have both the pic and name of the lady (but maybe this are actually getting classed as MP and not Escort -- no VIP so I get both in a search it seems). I also thought putting links in that were behind some password access was also not allowed.

I'm guessing you've already filed the problem report for duplicate profiles.

Reply Quote Report

team_rocket_qwerty4 years ago83 reads

Never trust first reviews unless

It's a trusted reviewer.

Reply Quote Report

coeur-de-lion4 years ago85 reads

We can agree on this one . . . .

The most obvious is a new reviewer reviewing a girl with no reviews. Even TER is cautious about these. They are shill reviews most often than not. Most reviewers new to the hobby and putting up their first review will start with well-reviewed girls, not new ones. I like to see about 20 reviews from an individual, with a few that include girls I have seen, before I can say he is, or is not, "a trusted reviewer."

Reply Quote Report

MysteryAdmin4 years ago83 reads

Re: We can agree on this one . . . .

Posted By: coeur-de-lion

Re: We can agree on this one . . . .
The most obvious is a new reviewer reviewing a girl with no reviews. Even TER is cautious about these. They are shill reviews most often than not. Most reviewers new to the hobby and putting up their first review will start with well-reviewed girls, not new ones. I like to see about 20 reviews from an individual, with a few that include girls I have seen, before I can say he is, or is not, "a trusted reviewer."

I don't necessarily disagree with you on this BUT my very first review here, at TER, was for a provider who didn't have any reviews. So my review of her was her first review AND my first review here. It's been so long now, I don't remember if she had any reviews elsewhere. I don't consider that review to be a 'shill' of any kind. I'm posting this because I pretty much fit your description even though I wasn't trying to gain access to the site here or anything like that. I had to start somewhere, so I started with a recent experience I had.