Write Review
2,079,037 Total Reviews 3,864 New Reviews
10,195 Users Online

TER General Board

Post the most photoshopped/deceptive picture contest
BrosB4Hos 2178 reads
posted

Here's my entry. Note the deformed railing/light switch cover plate - when ya photoshop, try not to distort the background......

mrfisher640 reads

that the gravitation field is distorting the local time and space.

Einstein would have been proud.

8o)

ReplyQuoteReport
CaseySterling539 reads

I'm actualy a part-time photographer and I do photo manipulations for fun and for my work.
The switchplate is disorted because they used the "liquify" filter. Imagine being able to shrink,enlarge or take away anything in a photo. My guess is she made herself look thinner with bigger boobs.(not to mention one thigh is much wider than the other....)

Also they used some SERIOUS skin smoothing. She is older and there is no way she has no wrinkles!

I really don't understand why women do this. If a guy shows up and you look nothing like this he's not going to be happy! I mean I play with the saturation and brightness in my photos and crop things out of the background but I never ADD or SUBTRACT anything from me.(let's face it, the guy will notice and leave bad reviews)

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky46427 reads

It's not hard to figure out, really.  Their looks don't measure up but the want the income.  And they know that a certain percentage of guys won't walk, and will pay them anyway.  That's why many providers advertise on BP.

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd499 reads

I get a bit queasy and feel like throwing up!

ReplyQuoteReport
GaGamblerssmarterbrother314 reads

A couple of White Knights over there didn't think it was too funny, and actually tried to defend her.

Are you sure you aren't just trying to lose your "Mattgina" label? lmao

FWIW, I agree with both you and WKR, my stomach does flip flops as well looking at that pic, and not in the good way.

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd253 reads

in hair pulling! ;)

ReplyQuoteReport
charlie445363 reads

"Its me or its free"

ReplyQuoteReport
GaGamblerssmarterbrother258 reads

If that is who showed up at my door, free would be waaaay too expensive, even if I were MP67 type drunk. Of course if I were MP67 type drunk, her tits might seem even to me then. lmao

ReplyQuoteReport
rightonppl258 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
scoed523 reads

At leased it was a photo of a human at one time. Check this ad out it is a photo of a mannequin. There was a thread on it in November.




The thread.
http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=419631&boardID=12&page=

Related Link: The ad.

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd282 reads

It's opposite of my experience with, I think it's the Microsoft smart-phone commercial where the woman is modeling her sexy outfit, while he's busy on his cellphone, and she's say; "Oh, really!" I thought she was a mannequin at first.

ReplyQuoteReport
GaGamblerssmarterbrother238 reads

Unless of course your name is Charlie Harper, and your nemisis is "Manny Quin" lol

ReplyQuoteReport
mattradd186 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
mrfisher344 reads

She just laid there.

8o)

ReplyQuoteReport
SinsOfTheFlesh251 reads

And I have to very deeply and humbly apologize too. I have now met the lady, and she is quite genuine. As it turns out, this pic was taken by a camera phone, and the poor quality is due to the poor pixel quality of the camera.

This is a good example though, of why its a good idea not to jump to conclusions based on a picture. A mistake I am guilty of here. *deep blush*

ReplyQuoteReport
scoed202 reads

That is of a photo of a real human not of a mannequin? If so I must apologize as well. But it is still part her fault. As a business the ladies are responsible for the photos that get out. If the photo in the ad looks like a mannequin or is over photo shopped, you get what you get. All we have to go on is the photos in the ads as far as looks go as review don't have pictures. Still if it is a photo of a real human and not a mannequin I am sorry to have poked fun.

ReplyQuoteReport
Annon426 reads


The guy, or gal, clearly has an ax to grind with Hanna, is everyone going to just blindly ripper her apart without questioning the alias's motives?

I don't feel like defending her, but you should be able to draw your own conclusions from looking at her face and her right hand.

ReplyQuoteReport
EdrienneCole317 reads

This is the sort of thing that belongs on a Gent's Only type of board.  Posting pics of a lady, showing her face and watermark, and then shredding her (however justly deserved) should fall soundly within the area of being making a personal attack, not to mention being just plain mean and spiteful. I thought mods were around to keep these sort of posts at bay.

I understand there is a reason for disliking photoshopped pics (beyond fixing saturation/contrast/etc), but come on...

ReplyQuoteReport
justajohn123309 reads

I don't see it as an attack,i see it more as a warning to potential guys who might get ripped off .and also as a warning to girls who do overly photoshop, get caught doing it, and you will be ripped a new one cause that wil not be tolerated.i almost got taken once because a girl was way photoshopped and  pussies still gave the girl good scores. I had the balls to tell her and walk out,i am sure I am in the minority, and most   guys will suck it up and go through with it cause they don't have the balls to  walk out. putting the girls on notice and calling them on there shitty and deceiving advertising  is the only way to keep them from doing it.  If you don't OVERLY photoshop, you got nothing to worry about.

ReplyQuoteReport
GaGamblerssmarterbrother285 reads

As long as guys keep showing up at their doorstep, going through with the appointment because of "lack of balls" and then adding insult to injury to the rest of us by actually writing a favorable review after being scammed. Hey someone has to call them out for it.

ReplyQuoteReport
EdrienneCole238 reads

Obviously, the "pussies" as you call them might not walk out or post an accurate review.  Then do it yourself! ;-)  I still find it wrong to single someone out as this thread has done.  A general discussion on the matter would suffice and if guys still need to warn others about a particular female, do it on the Gent's Only board and through reviews.

ReplyQuoteReport
AintNoHumbleHo288 reads

Someone decided ter should be a boys only board and they are getting their wish.

ReplyQuoteReport
SinsOfTheFlesh220 reads

lol it has always been a boy's board. But, despite its flaws, TER still has a better track record with providers than most of the other review sites.

ReplyQuoteReport
SinsOfTheFlesh230 reads

You might have a point, except the lady in question has 2 pages of reivews, all of which are positive. Have you actually seen her? Do you know better than the men who have seen her face to face?

You must really think you are special to think your little opinion outweighs all of her reviews.

ReplyQuoteReport
justajohn123205 reads

please note i did not mean any particular girl on this thread, as i do not even know who you are talking about. i am speaking in general terms as i don't know who any of the girls pictured are, but i do see some OVERLY done photoshop. my experience was a few years ago.
the entire system here is flawed, but only because people are flawed, and frankly, i think its a damn good system, just that nasty wrench in the gears: people and there opinions. some guys will never write reviews,  or they will never write a negative review for fear some girls will see a negative review and fear they may get one as well and never see them. for some the experience is so bad, that a review will not suffice, and yes, emotions will take hold and they may take there story to the public boards out of spite.  

but the main point is plain and simple, if a provider DOES NOT OVERLY PHOTOSHOP her pictures, then what does she care when a girl who obviously does is brought to light?  I would go as far as glammed up pics being false advertising too, unless the girl will ALWAYS be glammed up, but i am sure i am going to an extreme on that part. what you girls don't realize is most of you are fucking beautiful, now i may be in the minority here, but nothing is better then seeing completely untouched pics, some makeup, and seeing a  natural beauty.  when i see pics like that, my expectations are at normal level,and i have been blown away more then a few times.  its an old adage, better to under-promise and over-deliver then over-promise/under-deliver(ie:glammed up/photoshopped pics). but thats just my "little opinion" ;)

ReplyQuoteReport
inicky46183 reads

...where a gal, under the alias FakeFinder,  outs providers for using other people's pictures.  No one disputes that she gets it right and many of us support her.  Recently, she has received unspecified threats.  That's how close to the bone this cuts.  My position is, while I understand why certain providers wish to maintain privacy by using others' pix, I don't buy it.  There are lots of ways to  alter the pictures so they can't be tied to you but are still a fair representation of what you look like.  And I don't have a problem with glamour shots that fix small imperfections.  Luckily, I've only seen well-reviewed gals who look like their pix (in one case even better).  But I'm in favor of zero tolerance for anyone who substantially alters a pic or uses pix of others.

ReplyQuoteReport
Annon166 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
1192967150 reads

I have to agree with the part about the natural, light make-up and untouched photos. Now that's what I'm talkin' about.

ReplyQuoteReport
Annon204 reads

name here on this thread?

There are a lot of reason for naming someone on a public board, in this case none are good.

ReplyQuoteReport
1192967216 reads

I have a problem because this isn't the first time this photo has been discussed and seems to me the topic was covered pretty well the first time. I agree that seriously altering your photos should be discussed and decried but with this one, enough already. One of the first thoughts I had when I saw this post was, What! not again!

ReplyQuoteReport
tranquilwaters210 reads

What's the big deal? If you don't like a providers pictures, than don't look at them and if you find them so offensive, don't book an appointment with her! There is no need to trash her! Grow up and move on to a provider that interests you! Sheesh- don't you all have anything better to do with your time than rip someone apart that you never met?

ReplyQuoteReport
scoed173 reads

That is what is the big deal. We are paying for a certain experience and the ladies looks are a big part of that. I reserve the right to blast any such attempt of fraud, especially if they do such a poor job at it. How would you like it if a client booked you with false screening information? Provider pictures are a big part of the screening information for us guy to make sure we are getting the session we want. Fraud is fraud and those who practice it need to be pointed out.

I would never trash a lady for her looks ever but for a failed attempt at fraud you bet you I will openly mock her. Ladies like her give the hobby a bad name. If she was selling used cars on the internet she wound be sued for false advertising. That is what is the big deal.

ReplyQuoteReport
rightonppl177 reads

On some boards, providers are as enthusiastic as clients in ridiculing deceptive ads and clumsy B&S photos that reflect poorly on their trade.

ReplyQuoteReport
EdrienneCole201 reads

... can easily kill someone's reputation. And for what?  So a group of folks can chime in and sound like experts on a topic they have no personal knowledge of?  How small of a person do you need to be for that to sound like fun to you?

If anyone has followed my posts, they would know that I am all for accountability on both sides of our demimonde.  What I am not in favor of is random targeting of individuals by those who haven't personal experience with a situation.  That aspect moves a discussion from the accountability basis to that of the rumor-mill of a junior high school cliche.

If anyone has actual *knowledge* of a massively photoshopped and unrealistic likeness (which could only come from having either been present at the photo shoot and having seen the 'before' and 'after', or from having met the lady in person) is one thing.  For people to *presume* that there is massive editing of a pic and then lambaste the lady, is quite another.  If someone has actually met the lady in the OP and THEY feel her pics are not representative of her, it should indeed be noted in the review (profile and text).  As it is, her profile already states that the pics are real, but they're really old.  What more does anyone need to say?  

Gents would also be well served to know that just as they use a lady's posts on boards like these to help evaluate their desire to see her, ladies use gent's posts in much the same way.

Save the pettiness for an insider's club where you are immune from the consequences of your actions.

ReplyQuoteReport
boneboybob185 reads

TER's "Reviewers Only" board is about as watertight at the Titanic was after it hit an iceberg. Guys regularly leak stuff to ladies in order to curry favor.

The bottom line is if it's on the Internet, assume everyone can read it.

ReplyQuoteReport
scoed182 reads

But I am surprised by the reactions of of some of the ladies. Women that use heavily photo shopped photos hurts the business of those who don't as guys will always assume the worse if there are a lot of that going on as there is. I think blasting the fakers out there committing such fraud would be fine by the honest providers but guess I am wrong.

In the past I have exposed the bad behaviors of two men on this site as their behavior reflects badly one those who respect boundaries set by the ladies. This is no different. Bad behaviors needs to be blasted by everyone in my opinion.

The OP showed us a badly photo shopped picture that was an attempt to commit fraud on us guys. It is more than fair to point out that the pictures boobs are not even, the hips are different sizes or any other insult issued about such an obvious attempt at fraud.

Making fun of a ladies looks just because you don't agree with her or because you don't find her attractive is not cool but once she tries to commit fraud all bet are off. I say blast away, maybe she will learn.

ReplyQuoteReport
EdrienneCole190 reads

... and I am totally with you on the "bad apples" casting shadows on the rest.  I suppose I would prefer to see this handled with a little more tact is all.  If the discussion is to be on poorly photoshopped pics, there are plenty of them out there to choose from that don't carry a watermark or display a person's face.  The discussion can then the truly about the photoshopping and not devolve into personal attacks.  Discussing a pic that shows a lady's face and watermark cannot help but become personal - especially when the comments take the direction these have.  I simply feel that the only people who can comment on the veracity of the pics are those who have been in her presence - and there are two pages of first hand accounts of that already!  What further, greater purpose does the OP hope to serve?

And I am one of those ladies who is adversely affected by ladies who use heavily photoshopped pics.  I hear all the time variations of how I can't possibly look how I do (or perform as indicated) because *no one* can possibly actually earn the ratings I get.  Then there are the barbs about how in order to get the ratings/charge the rate I do, I *must* be doing something bad to get them - unsafe behaviors, discounts for reviews, discount my rate, etc.  People just can't accept that *some* of us are truly as we present ourselves... and that often comes from so many ladies out there misrepresenting themselves.  Even so, I find it distasteful for people who haven't even met the lady in question to hold a good ol' Southern-style lynching.  

I suppose I've been mistaken in what the culture of this board is about.  FakeFinder is lauded for doing gent's homework for them in terms of doing 'pic research' and outing the fake pics (though honestly, I do wonder if some of the models these "fake" pics belong to are actually sporting ladies themselves and were simply too naive not to use their work portfolio).  Perhaps someone would volunteer to be the "bad-photoshopping-exposer"... but then again, wouldn't that take actually meeting the lady in question to know how her pics compared to her live appearance?  Oh wait... reviewers already do that....  See, that's where it gets convoluted and redundant which is why I se this as a very thinly (and shabbily) veiled attack on the lady in question.

ReplyQuoteReport
MissMilani182 reads

I agree with you 100%.  My ratings are nowhere near yours, but I frequently hear that people do not expect me to be the person I am because there are so many people that are not in this sort of an environment.  It is very unfortunate that people have such a negative perception of others in this "hobby" which we all are happy to be a part of.

As for the lady-bashing, no one wants to be subjected to that in a public forum- whether face or watermark is visible or not.  In all truthfulness- a naive lady may not even know that some scuzzy semi-pro photographer had actually done that himself.  I don't see her arms holding the camera, implying that someone else took the photo... and I would never have noticed the little flaws if they were not pointed out to me.  It may sound like I am playing "devil's advocate"- but it is true.  Remember what happened with the mannequin lady when it turned out to actually be a picture of her and the gent that saw her said she was a nice gal?

And one more excellent point Miss Cole made, girls DO use their work portfolio out of naivety.  I made that EXACT same (and very dangerous) mistake myself.  I had all of these beautiful pictures and no money to hire photographers of the same caliber (at $1800 for a few hours, NO ONE just starting out has that much money lying around).  I chose to use images from modeling jobs I had done instead of going the free photographer route.  I will not say how, but yes... it was found out.  Luckily, I ended up safe in the end but some girls do NOT think about the danger of using photos which are available elsewhere before attaching them to their ad and website.  So some of these "fakes" which people call out, may (in fact) be the ladies themselves.  I'm not sure what percentage (and will concede it is probably not the majority) but there is a very real possibility that the "model" in the photos is the girl that will show up.  So you guys can continue to throw stones and everyone else will be enjoying the lovely lady that comes to their front door.

That is what reviews are for- and THAT is why there is a line that references whether the photo is accurate or not.

ReplyQuoteReport
1192967168 reads

...and I agree that the practice of severely altering photos should be called out. It is an attempt to mislead. Again in this case though enough is enough.

ReplyQuoteReport
1192967164 reads

I agree. Don't trash her. I was emphasizing more that in this case it is a repeat. Enough already.

ReplyQuoteReport
Arianna33282 reads

That is pretty bad! You have my vote!

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!