have they announced anything other than an arrest.  Who, where, actual evidence they have??  Glad they got him pretty darn fast.  That third girl was lucky!!!!

Here's the link!

I can already see his defense attorney claiming she was robbing him and he was defending himself when he pumped her full of holes. If his defense counsel uses the self defense argument the defamation of the victim's character is going to be a blood bath. I can only imagine the seedy low life image the defense is going to paint of the hobby as he portrays the victim as a ruthless, scum bag who preyed on innocent victims who were simply wishing to get a therapeutic massage.  If the budget allows, the defense will call to the stand an expert witnesses who will testify as to how the dark subculture of Internet prostitution destroys lives, families and society in general. Of course, the prosecution won't be able to use expert testimony to counter the defense's expert witness because doing so would legitimize to some extent prostitution. Don't you just love attorneys. Remember most of the shit birds in the House, Senate and yes the White House are attorneys.

BTW this is a nonpartisan response.

I hope he gets his.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/21/us/21killing.html?_r=1&hp

Regarding the New York Times article -

This situation implies that the police worked with computer security people. The cops are usually not knowledgeable enough with such technical matters.

There is something about Mr. Markov's face that seems suspect. To me it seems like a simmering anger. Even if the police didn't see anything obvious in his behavoir during the traffic stop in Walpole, there is an undercurrent of tension. His shape of head and hairstyle match the surveillance videos perfectly.