I was doing some research on a potential lady to see. I read some of her reviews and they seemed pretty good and all matched in performance and looks grade. I PM'd a reviewer as his review left some things open that I had to clarify. I sent the PM asking a few questions pertaining to his date with her and he let me know that I was indeed right and that the provider did go BARE BACK with him.  

You can bet your ass she's doing BBFS with others, but don't "out" her! First, you don't know for sure. Second, it's none of your business. Just put her on your DNS list and move on.  

does not mean you have to. Your decision sir!

PM a few others, but be circumspect.

Can you trust the reviewer's contention that the provider went bareback?

Because if you do, you then start a cascade of shit that could place you on a dns list. You have a he said situation...like for instance how would you feel if I checked a reference and she told me you pushed for BB? And then I outed you? Just on one hookers word

Yes she is likely doing so with other.

^ true everyone is barebacking someone.. many providers have partners at home they live with or bf's they see "outside of work"
They dont know what their partners are doing when they aren't home.

you may need to back off for a while. You're in too close - too involved.

Why give a flying rat's ass if a provider gave bbfs? or to be more precise, if the "rumor" is that she did because unless she offers it to you specifically there's no 100% definite proof that she did to anybody else before you.

But don't out her.

sound advice..

Could a provider have bbfs with you if you didn't want it? I'd venture to say no.

as long as you insist on using protection,you should be fine....the truth of the matter is that you cannot be there every time somebody has sex to make sure condoms are used...for example, you cannot control what is she doing in her personal life. she could be having bare sex with her bf who is cheating on her and could give her an std...that will never show up on the reviews...

A bbfs thread without a reply from ROGM?!

by multiple sources, then you should bail. If only one guy tells you this, how credible is he? Do you personally know him? Or, is he some guy you just sent a PM to? There are certain guys I know that I can trust, met them at a M & G, have similar tastes, etc.

whether or not you are new here.............but if you read a significant number of posts.........you can learn a lot about people who post here.

If I pushed for bareback with an escort, I would expect to be outed for that.
Sometimes you say stuff that truly makes me sick.. You are goddamn right I would share info like that.
I wouldn't give a cascading shit as to what the repercussions were.
We are talking about life, and death here. That outweighs a stupid reputation on a fuck board.
Fucking unbelievable

You completely missed my point. I was illuminating the high possibility of a lie as in you only have one person's word. Put yourself in the position of the one who is being accused of pushing for BB and in reality you did not...and she outed you. And how do you suppose he is going to prove she actually did offer it?

The 9 per 100,000 number is for NEW diagnoses of HIV/AIDS within a given year per 100,000 people.  The total proportion of people living with HIV/AIDS is actually much higher than that.  At the end of 2012, there were about 1.2 million people living with HIV/AIDS in the United States.  If the population was close to 320 million, that works out to be about 375 per 100,000 living with HIV/AIDS.  That is for the whole U.S., I'm not sure if California is greater or less than the average (though I would assume greater).  Also, the transmission rates you gave only accounts for one unprotected encounter.  If the infected client (or provider) has several repeat visits, then the risk for the uninfected party goes up greatly.  The odds are still low even if a person does choose to play recklessly.  However, its not quite the "lottery odds" that your post would suggest.

-- Modified on 11/24/2015 5:15:47 PM

Your numbers assume that *everybody* who has HIV is having unprotected sex. It is extremely unlikely that many people are knowingly having unprotected sex with HIV.

Fair enough. I agree with your rebuttal that the people spreading HIV will primarily be the people not realizing they have the virus.  However, IMO the 384 out of 100 million and 192 out of 100 million statistics do not really mean much.  Those are the chances for one encounter.  Once you have contracted the virus, it doesn't matter how many more times it has been transmitted to you.  A more meaningful statistic would be if I had unprotected penile-vaginal sex with an infected partner 500 times, what is the likelihood that I have or have not contracted the virus.

Most escorts and mongers get tested every three months. 500 "events" is a ridiculous number. Once a week for 3 months would be 12 "events." Most don't repeat weekly but for the sake of argument I'll say once a week.This is with somebody who already has HIV.

I agree that unprotected heterosexual sex is not the risk that most people believe it to be, but it still is a risk.  I believe that Magic Johnson is completely heterosexual and a non IDU individual ( for charlie, I have some doubt).  So while the risk is far greater gay and bisexual men, the risk is still real for heterosexuals.  Chances are good that a straight person will never contract the virus even if they don't exercise great caution.  The disease is less common than most people think, and the transmission rate is less than most people believe.  However, just because the odds are in my favor doesn't mean that I want to, or even think it's a good idea to test out the theory.

I have a nice cock though?😇