I have to admit that I get pretty flustered at times with TER's unwritten rules/criteria. I've been trying to gain access to the reviewers only board and I meet the written criteria that TER lists which is a minimum of 10 reviews. I've been denied for not having enough posts on the discussion boards. Why doesn't TER list a minimum board posting as part of the criteria to gain access to the reviewers only board?

If it went through to admin and they rejected for that reason, it's not gone. It's not like you have to type it up again. You have to make the necessary edits and resubmit it. If she's on bp, she's probably on a scraper somewhere that admin will be fine with. Put her phone number in a search engine.  

I'm now the leading poster on the San Diego,discussion board yet the staff is still denying me access to the reviewers only board.  I was denied access in the past for not participating in the discussion boards so now I go beyond what is expected but the staff is being pompous. What a crock of shit.

Unless name-calling the same people who must approve you on the RO Board sounds smart to you.  Why not instead try posting on the General Board and other discussion boards?
Also, while I'm not on the RO board at the moment I have been a member in the past for years.  You're not missing much.

"Are we there yet? Are we there yet? Are we there YET!!!???" lmao

Thank you for your valuable insight

For clarification, I was referring to the situation and not the staff when I used the phrase "crock of shit."

What kind of "inside information" do you really expect to be privy to once you gain access to the RO board?

Too much estrogen? I'm sure you are just so full of testosterone. Lol.  

Actually, if you look closely, its Janetfromstatefarm that is sucking....I mean GaGging on dick. Too much estrogen in Janet, paired with testosterone...now it makes even more sense.