Suggestion and Policy

why?
perfectstorm 19 Reviews 854 reads
posted

Obviously they don't have to use the old whitelists for verification, but there is no reason to remove them. Since whitelists are in chronological order, all they have to do is look at the top ones if they only want recent ones. No need ot look lower on the page. But why erase the old ones? That is part of the guy's history, and some people like to see that a guy has been around and getting whitelists for many years. It is just like the reviews for the ladies. It is all part of the histoty. Do you suggest removing old reviews?

-- Modified on 11/30/2012 11:08:29 AM

my girls have the best ideas..when a provider checks a new client's whitelists..the ones from 2008 and before do her absolutely no good..some are retired..most providers will forget who the guy even was from 5 years ago..her idea was to refresh all the whitelists to keep them current and verifiable..keep the whitelists from 2009 to 2012 and drop the rest since they are useless to any provider..keeping a 3 year limit on whitelists helps the provider to make sound and current decisions as to any new clients..

is like looking at old reviews. Who cares what happened back in 2008. The most recent white lists are the first ones you see as you scroll down, why would an escort even go past the most current white lists.

Posted By: macdaddy1944
my girls have the best ideas..when a provider checks a new client's whitelists..the ones from 2008 and before do her absolutely no good..some are retired..most providers will forget who the guy even was from 5 years ago..her idea was to refresh all the whitelists to keep them current and verifiable..keep the whitelists from 2009 to 2012 and drop the rest since they are useless to any provider..keeping a 3 year limit on whitelists helps the provider to make sound and current decisions as to any new clients..

BeenStrokin1206 reads

The guy is not going to turn into "Jack the Ripper" in 3 year (and truthfully how many guys have all their WL's from 3 years ago really???? It's the quantity of whitelists a guy has that is important to a girl viewing them, Not the  dates the WL was written.   This is another sorry to say,  "dumb" suggestion.

Obviously they don't have to use the old whitelists for verification, but there is no reason to remove them. Since whitelists are in chronological order, all they have to do is look at the top ones if they only want recent ones. No need ot look lower on the page. But why erase the old ones? That is part of the guy's history, and some people like to see that a guy has been around and getting whitelists for many years. It is just like the reviews for the ladies. It is all part of the histoty. Do you suggest removing old reviews?

-- Modified on 11/30/2012 11:08:29 AM

Engagement810 reads

since you have all of your whitelists this year.

I have no current whitelists as I mainly see BP providers. My best reference is an agency owner whose girls I saw up until about 2006... but I was very good friends with her, and we had a number of personal friends in common, so she knows me very well. She has given me an over-the-top personal reference every time I have asked, and I have yet to be turned down for a current session.

If I lost her, I'd be in trouble and essentially have to start over. Why should her reference not be valid when she knows me so well? Have I turned into a mass murderer in the last six years?

PS - I WAS whitelisted by her, but she took down all her whitelists a while back because she felt it was too random, and wanted to only give personal references for the guys she felt very comfortable. Even with that, every time I contact her for a reference, she makes it VERY clear that I'd better be a good boy, or else :-)

-- Modified on 12/5/2012 3:20:34 PM

Register Now!