Otherwise, why do they make us go through the long form if they're only gonna go by the first guy's review anyway? If TER gets enough subsequent reviews saying so and so doesn't do anal or doesn't kiss with tongue or whatever, her profile should be revised.
Another thing that doesn't make sense about the form- early on, you have to state if she does massage or not. It's yes or no. No "don't know." Later on down, you can say "don't know," but if you bypass the first massage question, your form comes back because you haven't filled in all the blanks!
Again, what does all of this nitty gritty detail mean unless staff updates what a provider performs and her price?
I also notice that even after discovering someone posted a fake review, that person's word about what she provided was still part of her profile. Makes no sense at all. If you know he was lying, why not go with one of the later client's assessment?
True. The problem is that we get about 300 reviews in every day. Limitations in personel make if difficult to go back to each profile and review and compair each item on them. Problem reports are the best way to keep the profiles up to date. We need the help of the communty to keep all the profiles up to date here.
-- Staff
Staff,
Are you suggesting that if we see information that needs to be updated on the profile of the provider we just wrote a review on we should submit a problem report identifying the items that need to be updated?
rik
Definately, this should be done. Last week i read a review that stated the provider did BBBJ, Greek, and other things, but when I read the rest of the reviews for her, there was clearly a problem. Review was not consistent with other I read, and even stated that the appt took place in Orlando, whilst the provider was from NY (no, she wasn't on tour). It was clear to me that the review was on the wrong profile, so i filled out a report and it got fixed, restoring integrity to the review and provider.
Every little bit helps..
-- Staff
when i finally paid my membership fee and saw what my profile said, you bet you sweet ass i made a problem report, and send a mail saying i sent a problem report with exactly the same info to admin@
everything is now correct, thank Staff!
as long as your requests for changes are able to be backed up somehow (like pix are old: no they are not, link to page)
i have found Staff to be quite accomodating when it comes to truth.
luck and play safe,
Nicole
New review comes in for "Sally" from a given agency. This agency used to have a different "Sally" working for them. The old "Sally" has TER reviews from 18 months ago. New "Sally" gets her first review appended to old "Sally's" profile. This could be prevented if those who approve reviews would take a second to glance at old Sally's profile.
If somebody gets a new review after 18 months, review approvers should take a closer look at the profile. Old "Sally's" last review is more than year old. OS is described in this profile as blond, 36 years old, DD cup. However, Sally is described in the new review submitted for approval as 19 with red hair and A cup. I realize that those who review reviews have a hell of a lot of work. However something like this should be caught up front. Rather than just appending the new review to (perhaps) the wrong profile, how about adding a Notes section where the review approver can at least acknowledge that the information appears to be inconsistant?
thirsty