Just some thoughts about building a better review system...

Numerical descriptors are hard and inflexible and force the reviewer to make choices that lack nuance. How about replacing numerical descriptors altoegher with qualitative descriptors?

For example, do away with performance "scores" and replace it with multiple performance descriptors.... these examples are rudimentary
but would give the reader of a review a more complete sense of what it is like to enjoy the
lady's company:

attitude

uninterested
attentive
focused
energized

performance

non responsive
passive
responsive
really into it

overall impression

would not recommend
nice enough time
would recommend
stay away she's mine!


Appearance is tougher, because of the differences in preference among hobbyists. But there are fundamental questions that could be answered
in a review in a non-perjorative fashion:

Are the pics real
accurate
fair representation
glossy / glamour but its definitely her
kinda like her
might have been her once upon a time
she does not look like her pics to me
not her pics

bodt type descriptors: (to be used in addition to the current estimates of height breast size and cup, and a new weight estimate) Yeah I know there are still problems with this - any suggestions?

tiny
petite thin
slender
average
athletic or defined
tone
soft
plush

I want to use non-perjorative but descriptive terms here that are useful to the reviewer and not inherently negative.

Does the lady's body style appeal to you? (this question could be useful in evaluating the reviewer's overall characterization..)

yes
no

Please consider this a conversation starter. I am not invested in my suggested descriptors - I am sure that the hobby community could greatly improve on this basic idea....

Yes it would be a bit more difficult to implement. But as a hobbyist I would rather have this kind of opinion to evaluate than hard numerical descriptors that convey no real information. And I suspect that the ladies would have less
aggravation with this system on the one hand, and would also receive more beneficial feedback on the other.


-- Modified on 4/1/2009 9:49:49 AM