I find the place where I can enter my rating of a site, but I cannot find where I read the cumulative/weighted average ratings from other hobbiests.  What, pray tell, is the point of reviewing a site (presumably an agency or a mall) if your fellow punters cannot read and evaluate the results.

It would also be helpful to see beyond the ratings (if we could even read the ratings) to see what criteria contributed to determing them.  Are the raters reviewing just the design of the website, the ease of navigation, the quality of the images?  It would be more useful to have the rating system take into account accuracy of images, validity of service promised, etc. Bait and switch practices should be noted.  All of these things are being communicated on a girl-by-girl basis.  However, collating it to get a feel for the honesty of a given site requires studying and comparing an awful lot of data.  Some sort of tool embeded into the search form would make it so much easier and more accurate.  By using the agency phone number in the escort search page, I have begun collating data of this nature myeslf, but it is very time consuming and, frankly, uses up server time which would be reduced under my suggestion.

For instance:  Is Le Fantasy which is based in either Prague or The Baltic; a ripoff?  The feedback I have gotten has not been reassuring.  Or: How is the attitude at Exotica 2000?  The attitude of the provider is not that much more important than the attitude of the office staff.  One rude person making the appointments can ruin the experience.  As can one "Are you sure you can afford this, honn?  "Does NJ-Exotics, and their sisteren, have mostly valid pics?  They certainly go out of the way to prove it to you?"  Is that a scam?  ("The lady doest protest too much.)  With a well orgainized, supportive staff such as we seem to have acquired, this should not be that much of a TSURAS.

You search for a girl.  You find on a site which looks kewl, but she has no reviews. absent specific girl information for the honey who has captured your immagination, then detailed site reviews including the charcteristics I cited above might encourage the punter to try an un-reviewed provider, essentially taking one for the team, but not as blind as if we were going purely on the website and the images.  With no feedback.

After all of this babble, I am sure you get my drift.  My proposal requires rejigging the enter Site Review form and statistical methods, but it sure would be a help.

Thanks for listening.