I just had what I thought was an accurate and thoughtful review rejected for "lack of explicit details".  I'm sure this is highly subjective, according to the whims of whomever may be checking reviews at any given time..BUT, (some thoughts)

1.  There are many other recently accepted reviews on the Boston board with far fewer details that I submitted...(???)
2.  Complete Graphic details may or may not be important to describing the overall experience.  Out of respect to the wishes and style of providers who ..as part of their total "GFE experience"..it may be more approiate (and accurate) to leave the most graphic details suggested to one's imagination.  The basics of the session were accurately described...as they occured

I've re-written the "Juicy Details" section of the review, but I feel like we're being pushed into providing "porn just for porn's sake"..as opposed to accurate reviews that describe the total feeling of the session.  Not every hobbyist is looking for sheer T&A "porn star" experience

JJM

All of my reviews are for entertainment purposes only. A fantasy. A dream come true as you will. Although I cannot recall ever writing a review that was too explicit.

Your last review of Gabrielle (12.5.02) was turned down for bad website.  At the time we checked the website, it did not work.  I just rechecked it and it is working now. I approved your reviews and credited you the 15 days.

-- Staff