rather than have to depend on the provider to do it.  See arguments on the GD board, same date/time.  We should be allowed the same ability to choose who we are linked with via the WL as the ladies have.

I only have one WL so it does not affect me personally but this actually makes a huge amount of sense.  Agreed that a WL is a gift... but there are way too many reasons why a client would not want to be associated with a particular provider.  TER should change this, with the sole proviso that once deleted, it would not be restored by TER.
skb  

do it for the users.

I agree. There has to be self control over the whitelisting by the hobbyist to delete who they want.

What if your whitelisting is  by a provider who is known to do bareback and you try contacting a provider who knows that provider is also known for that. It would jeopardize your chances of being able to meet that provider because she wants nothing to do with you

Who ever said you don't listen to the little people??? lol

Why would anyone  go see a provider that is known to do bareback (fs) ?


Also
Correct me if I'm wrong but I think a provider that is known to do bareback(fs) will be banned from TER and therefore will not be able to whitelist or do anything else on TER.

Thank You
2010 = 28

Because at the time, the guy did not know she was offering bareback and also maybe she started offering it later on.

There is no set policy that TER bans people who do bareback. There are a handful of providers that do bareback, based on reviews. You just have to read between the lines

Now I'm reading between the lines.


Thank You
2010 = 28

BTW I hope "the guy" is doing well.

to members concerns.  This is a good thing.