Suggestion and Policy

Ratings
MSON123 44 Reviews 7035 reads
posted

Ive been a member for some time but I am now confused.. I recently posted a review for a lady that was rejected. The reason being that the services provided as determined by the text of my review did not equal the performance rating I gave.

You see the Lady was a FBSM  MASSAGE only lady. So what they implied is that massage ladies can never receive higher than a 7 unless they offer more services more in line with FS as well. These ladies are being judged on the same scale as providers. This does not seem right because they are 2 different services. I do see Massage Only ladies with 10's so this tells me it is at the judgment of the admin and is not being uniformly applied. This was also the first time I was questioned so it must be a new policy.

I will say I have seen some massage ladies that were way better than many FS providers so how will one know who is good and who is not with a cap on the rating? Seems the arbitrary cap has smeared what a rating really means. Since I pay for that number I feel I am not getting true information.

Additionally some ladies may offer a bit more to special friends but ask not to be explicit. So a boosted rating is another way to say it was a great time.  You can compare this to BBFS I do not know any ladies who offer it BUT I do know a few who got pregnant. Some things are just not said because we are gentlemen.

This is not a rant just need some feedback.

I think that the only way around it is to state that while you can't give more than a 7, you would easily rate her a (8,9,10) based on the quality of her performance, and do your best to describe why that perfomance would merit a higher number.

There is one thing to remember:  Often a massage gal will do things that are not on her menu for a client because she feels like extending herself to him, but she does not want other clients to know.  You have to be careful not to spill the beans in that case.

mainly due to their limited services. In addition, I don't think that it is fair to the providers who do offer extensive services to be rated equally to a masseuse or vice versa.

And they should not get more then a 7, ever.
Whenever the profile says sex "no" that should apply.

Can we get a ruling on that from the front office?

The problem is, there are other things that a "massage only" gal might provide even besides oral.

For example, I've been offered some or all of these extras by massage gals:  body slides, prostate massage, bathing (or showering) together, titty fucking, mutual massaging, COF and even once a golden shower!

So, how does one convert these extras into extra points for performance?

Well the point I am making is that it IS NOT THE SAME. Therefore why are they rated on the same scale.
The fact that there are 2 categories massage and escort proves that they are different services. (we all know that) Therefore we EXPECT different things. All I am saying is that I think a different scale is implied by the fact there are 2 categories. By the admins applying the same scale they are in fact not differentiating between the 2 categories.

Posted By: topbossman
mainly due to their limited services. In addition, I don't think that it is fair to the providers who do offer extensive services to be rated equally to a masseuse or vice versa.

I'm surprised it was outright rejected.

In the text, you can give your higher preferred score for all to see. As long as everyone knows the scoring system, setting the ceiling at 7 is not really a penalty. Given that the sex-no choice is selected under services, 7 will automatically mean the max.

But I agree with Fisher. If BBBJ gets a higher point for FS providers, it should for FBSM gals as well.

Consider this view point... is the performance rating a rating of SERVICES OFFERED (ie how many services did she provide) OR HOW WELL were the services that were provided PERFORMED. Just because a provider Offers a service does not mean that is was provided and therefore just because she may OFFER (say MSOG) and you can not perform or partake does not mean her performance was any less! You also can not provide Judgment (a rating) if you have not experienced a particular service!

You made the perfect Point "As long as everyone knows the scoring system"!  does EVERYONE really know the scoring system? I do not!

Posted By: zisk
I'm surprised it was outright rejected.

But I agree with Fisher. If BBBJ gets a higher point for FS providers, it should for FBSM gals as well.

Register Now!