I have had a few providers no-show, or call at the last minute saying how about 3 hours from now. While I appreciate that this happens to providers as well, it is something I think that should be mentioned in the review section.
If a provider's rating somehow reflected reliability, we could make a reasonable judgement on whether or not to see that "amazing", "once in a lifetime" provider that might not show or will probably be an hour late. Without ever seeing a particular provider, they no-showed, I cannot share this info anywhere directly related to that provider. One can search the discussion boards but I think it would be helpful if it were part of the profile. Thanks,Michaeljones16c
Don’t understand the reasoning behind not allowing a full review of a provider not following through. The current policy of only being able to post in the regional forums about the encounter is not good enough imo. Many of these girls travel so the non-regional forums reach a wider audience.
The rule has always been "no meeting, no review"
I agree there should be some other way of letting the community know about providers who are known flakes, but I can't argue the logic that you can't review a session that never happened.
I don't know where you got the idea that this policy is "new' but since your memory is rather selective,(like forgetting about outing a provider on a board post/link) I can see how maybe you just dreamed it up.
First off I never “outed” anybody. I didn’t expose someone’s sexual orientation, their address, family members, workplace, none of that. If you call linking an article that’s openly available to anybody with an internet connection “outing” then you’ a bigger jackass than i thought.
Secondly here’s how I know it used to be a policy, my very first review about Sydnee Capri was about being flaked/no-showed. It got approved. Was up for a while until I cleared things up with Sydnee and actually saw her like we planned. So 0-2. Do us both a favor and don’t comment on my stuff anymore. I already ignored your username yet you continue to go out of your way to antagonize me.
...then it was a review that slipped through the cracks. Some review admin messed up. It does happen. TER has always (well since 2009 when I came on board) rejected NCNS reviews. Do a search it's been discussed often. I questioned admin about it once and their response was No, you can't review a NCNS. You didn't meet her how could you even fill out the form? I hope Admin will chime in on this.
Policy was definitely the wrong word to use. It would’ve been more accurate to say that one time a NQNS review I wrote did “slip through the cracks” as you pointed out. I kinda understand why they don’t now, it’s very easy for someone to write a fake encounter and we don’t want a provider’s reputation being needlessly ruined.
and TER obviously agreed because they took it down.
Also, if you have me on ignore, just how do you know what I said. The ignore function is yet another TER concept that you seen to not understand.
I'll make you a deal, you quit posting stupid stuff and I will quit calling you out over it. rofl
(Which I doubt), I will reiterate what he said.
Posting a link that has someone's real name is outing by TER's rules, and outing is a serious offense at TER.
It does not matter if they have been outed elsewhere, even if it is all over the news and google. You can't do it here, and you can't post a news link or other link to the outing.
Also if you have GaG on ignore, how do you know what he said?
As a follow up to your other claim that TER used to allow NCNS reviews, you are totally wrong. TER has never allowed them. As xyz said, TER staff is human and sometimes they make errors. If you truly had a NCNS review that you wrote approved, then it was a TER mistake, plain and simple.
-- Modified on 12/10/2017 12:22:34 PM