"breast appearance" was visible. It could be displayed along with the review.

The system shows attitude and atmosphere, but not breast appearance.

Their opinions are being collected, why not display them?

Thank for your consideration

I'm assuming you're talking about on the review summary page and not just what's in the provider's profile created during the first review. I do agree the profile is a bit lacking as it's largely driven by the first review. It would be nice if there were a way to have the profile average out the responses -- but then that's a bit hard to do with qualitative/textual responses.

I was thinking about the options for Breast Appearance the other day and am wondering if a numeric wouldn't be better that what we have now. Keep the enhanced/natural bit but seems to me that there's something between Average and Super Nice that is not Perky or Youthful and certainly not covered by any of the other options.

Maybe a combination of the two -- but that might be over complicating things. At the end of the day that's probably what should be in the Juicy Details and the details should be read.

First, you are being specific about adding breast appearance in the single line reviewer's summary at the bottom of a Profile page. Why not any of the OTHER stats in the profile?  I suppose TER could make the single line summaries like an excel spreadsheet with 10 or 20 columns 2 characters wide (and the descriptor running vertically at the top).
         
B  B  O  I  ...
B  R  T   T  ...
B  S  H   E  ...
J   T  E   M  ...
    A  R   S ...
    P
    P
----------------------------------------------------
Y  9  #
N  9  #
Y  8   ...
Y  9  ...
...

Please, NO!!!

 
Second, you are asking about displaying the collected data. Please see my other posts on better representing the range and number of replies, such as here:  

The review form would look like this:
   
 CIM - check all that apply  
 ( ) no  
 ( ) facial  
 ( ) cob (cum on body)  
 ( ) cum play  
 ( ) yes, spit  
 ( ) yes, swallow  
   
but the Profile would display info like this:
 
CIM
0 no  
1 facial  
2 cob (cum on body)  
0 cum play  
8 yes, spit  
4 yes, swallow  
 
That data would be from a minimum of 8 reviewers (the largest number of Xs on a single line). It could be one reviewer getting off 3 times (swallow, spit, COB) and another guy reporting one huge squirt as facial and COB, and so on. Basically, it would reduce YMMV to a reasonable expectation. 15 swallow + 1 spit looks like a sure swallow. 7 swallow + 11 spit looks reasonable. 1 swallow + 15 spit looks like an accident!