Suggestion and Policy

LTS--also consider this
greywolf 17 Reviews 1906 reads
posted

There can be perfectly good reasons that a review doesn't indicate any action which might support everything in a profile.  Anal might be a good example.  For myself that is something not on my shopping list.  If I'm writing a review & the profile already indicates it, I'll simply check 'don't know' because I don't know personally.  That would be no reason question the profile accuracy.  On the flip side if my review is the first one for a provider (therefore no profile exists)she may very well have mentioned in conversation that it was available.  In that case I'd check 'yes' although I didn't participate personally.  Again, no reason to question the profile IMHO.  Whenever I experience something that appears to conflict with the profile I do try to mention that in the review text with the YMMV caveat.

I was doing some searches today based on profile information and found many providers whose reviews did not support (or sometimes contradicted) the profile. For instance, many of the people who are marked "Really into it" for groups contain no evidence for this in their reviews. Also, some of the "Anal - yes" matches had recent reviews that stated this was definitely not available.Of course, YMMV holds true, and we all change our mind over time as to what we enjoy doing. My question, then, is how does the profile info get updated over time? I am sure the moderators don't have time to cross-check every review with the current information. Perhaps there could be a way for a reviewer to flag something that they believed to no longer be true, based on their experience.I can imagine it might still be a lot of hard work and hence impractical, though. Just a thought I had whilst trying to find my next date :)LTS

Staff2316 reads

If you see something that you belive is not true, or has changed, please fill out a "Problem Report" for the profile. We will udpate the info if there is and issue, and you will get 2 extra days.

There can be perfectly good reasons that a review doesn't indicate any action which might support everything in a profile.  Anal might be a good example.  For myself that is something not on my shopping list.  If I'm writing a review & the profile already indicates it, I'll simply check 'don't know' because I don't know personally.  That would be no reason question the profile accuracy.  On the flip side if my review is the first one for a provider (therefore no profile exists)she may very well have mentioned in conversation that it was available.  In that case I'd check 'yes' although I didn't participate personally.  Again, no reason to question the profile IMHO.  Whenever I experience something that appears to conflict with the profile I do try to mention that in the review text with the YMMV caveat.

Register Now!