Suggestion and Policy

For Us Ass Men Can We Get Ass Descriptions In Reviews?
utllti 1 Reviews 4935 reads
posted

I may speak for all ass men when I say this.  I think the time has come for ass descriptions to make their way to the "general" description of ladies on their TER Review Page.

At present, breast lovers get something like this:

breast size 36-37
breast cup DD
breast implants No
breast appearance Super nice

But us ass men get nothing.  We're going in blind.  I propose something like the following:

ass size              30
ass shape           Pancake
ass implants       No
ass appearance   Saggy

An ass man like me probably wouldn't see the above provider.  Now the lady below on the other hand, would be likely to get my business:

ass size             48
ass shape          Badonkadonk
ass implants       No
ass appearance   Super Nice

I think something like this would be appropriate.  There is a chart online that I don't think is perfect, but it gives a general idea of maybe some of the possible shape categories.  Not the best chart but it illustrates the idea.

Anyone with me on this?  Can we make this happen?


HobbyCity3155 reads

but how the heck are we measure their ass size.

Look at the guys guessing on breast size, all over the place.

I think it can be done.  Id rather have a guesstimation system than no system at all.  Because pics can be deceiving or out of date.

there are way too many assets in front to concentrate on and analyze..unless you have an attack of the ass munchies..

Posted By: utllti
I may speak for all ass men when I say this.  I think the time has come for ass descriptions to make their way to the "general" description of ladies on their TER Review Page.

At present, breast lovers get something like this:

breast size 36-37
breast cup DD
breast implants No
breast appearance Super nice

But us ass men get nothing.  We're going in blind.  I propose something like the following:

ass size              30
ass shape           Pancake
ass implants       No
ass appearance   Saggy

An ass man like me probably wouldn't see the above provider.  Now the lady below on the other hand, would be likely to get my business:

ass size             48
ass shape          Badonkadonk
ass implants       No
ass appearance   Super Nice

I think something like this would be appropriate.  There is a chart online that I don't think is perfect, but it gives a general idea of maybe some of the possible shape categories.  Not the best chart but it illustrates the idea.

Anyone with me on this?  Can we make this happen?


-- Modified on 8/18/2012 8:12:37 PM

I'm way more concerned with the ASSetts in the back than anything on the front lol

Posted By: macdaddy1944
there are way too many assets in front to concentrate on and analyze..unless you have an attack of the ass munchies..
Posted By: utllti
I may speak for all ass men when I say this.  I think the time has come for ass descriptions to make their way to the "general" description of ladies on their TER Review Page.

At present, breast lovers get something like this:

breast size 36-37
breast cup DD
breast implants No
breast appearance Super nice

But us ass men get nothing.  We're going in blind.  I propose something like the following:

ass size              30
ass shape           Pancake
ass implants       No
ass appearance   Saggy

An ass man like me probably wouldn't see the above provider.  Now the lady below on the other hand, would be likely to get my business:

ass size             48
ass shape          Badonkadonk
ass implants       No
ass appearance   Super Nice

I think something like this would be appropriate.  There is a chart online that I don't think is perfect, but it gives a general idea of maybe some of the possible shape categories.  Not the best chart but it illustrates the idea.

Anyone with me on this?  Can we make this happen?


-- Modified on 8/18/2012 8:12:37 PM

Not a bad idea to rate asses, but I think it should stay simple with less choices. Keep it simple. As it is, the breast choices have too many choices and are too subjective.  First of all, how many guys really know breast size or cup size? They are guessing at best, unless they get it right off the website, or the lady changes her own profile. As far as appearance, that is subjective and I think there are too many choices. What the hell is "super nice" supposed to mean? To me, perky is "super nice." "Youthful" could also be "super  nice." "Rock hard" might be super nice to some folks! "Youthful" could also be "perky." And waht about "unattractive" and "unnatural." Any of the other categories could fall under those. To me rock hard is unnatural. Really saggy is unattractive. (so is rock hard) There is just too much overlap. I think the breast appearance menu should be streamlined. So if we do get ass appearance, it too should be streamlined.

There was a suggestion on this board a few months ago, similar to yours. I kind of like his suggested options.

A link to the entirte thread is below. Here is an excerpt from the OP of that thread:

"If we want one menu for the rear end it could be: flat, small, average, bubble-butt, large, just plain huge.  Maybe slight-bubble-butt and super-bubble-butt?  We could have another for ass appearance.  sloppy, droopy, average, youthful, perky, gravity defying?"

That author is obviously more articulate than I am.  I simply had ass on the brain lol.  I love it!

My own post just inspired me to write a suggestion to streamline the breast descriptions. I don't want to hijack your thread.

BTW, check out this post on the GD board re "ass description":

http://www.theeroticreview.com/discussion_boards/viewmsg.asp?MessageID=537454&boardID=12&page=1#537454

Bootyhugs!3701 reads

This  has been asked for before.  I don't know why it's so hard to add.  I'm starting to think there is some kind of resistance on some kind of bias or som eprinciple.  There are so many breast related questions.  We literally should be stopping mid-session to read her bra as to whether she's 34" or 32", but not a single ass question.  I agree with 7 choices:
flat,
small,
average,
medium bubble-butt,
big bubble-butt,
large, and
just plain huge.  

Great Idea, should include something describing "Firmness". Whatever the rationale is for depicting Boobs (size, firmness, etc), should be applied to Azzes .

Is this another set of cartoons that would surely spark rioting in the Middle East?

But, seriously, I agree that some set of descriptive categories for the ladies' hindquarters is called for in TER reviews —though maybe something a little simpler than those depicted in the cartoons.

Larger behinds tend to be elephantine and unappealing.  I generally like them small, firm and shapely —though small and firm usually is shapely.  And note that a small ass doesn't rule out large breasts.  Though rare, there are some body types that feature a small behind and generous boobs.

In the end, though [pun intended —sort of], proportion is everything.

Register Now!