I would like to make a suggestion regarding the inclusion of providers clitoris endowement as part of the review. I am very oralitic and therefore always look for the size of the clitoris and unfortunately this attribute is not listed by the reviewers who has seen/visisted providers with this attribute. If it is possible, can this attribute be included as an option on the part of the reviewers.

what metrics would you propose to describe this fragile, yet alluring flower?

Is it only the clitoris you seek information on or the whole enchilata?

Enchlata? I thought it was refereed to a as a Taco.

Wow, this strikes me as going too far.  What's next, a LOOKS category for the rosebud?

BTW, it's 'enchilada'.  At least that's the way we spell it in California.

for size we could have:
1) small
2) average
3) medium
4) like a she-male

Then for lips:
1) small
2) average
3) large
4) flapping and clapping

Of course, as you mentioned the butt:
1) beautiful little rosebud
2) hot looking donut
3) average
4) like the profile of a basketball

Yeah, now that I think about it it might be a little much.    Or maybe somebody else should come up with the choices

As always, be safe and have fun

if it's that important to a few, they can ask ... but for me, it takes the magic out of seduction to have too much data!