Suggestion and Policy

Interesting idea....
mikamel 2 Reviews 10705 reads
posted
1 / 6

I would like to make a suggestion regarding the inclusion of providers clitoris endowement as part of the review. I am very oralitic and therefore always look for the size of the clitoris and unfortunately this attribute is not listed by the reviewers who has seen/visisted providers with this attribute. If it is possible, can this attribute be included as an option on the part of the reviewers.

mrfisher 115 Reviews 9602 reads
posted
2 / 6

what metrics would you propose to describe this fragile, yet alluring flower?

Is it only the clitoris you seek information on or the whole enchilata?

igroc 17 Reviews 9096 reads
posted
3 / 6

Enchlata? I thought it was refereed to a as a Taco.

Not4lng 58 Reviews 8468 reads
posted
4 / 6

Wow, this strikes me as going too far.  What's next, a LOOKS category for the rosebud?

BTW, it's 'enchilada'.  At least that's the way we spell it in California.

REGULARGUY 21 Reviews 9507 reads
posted
5 / 6

for size we could have:
1) small
2) average
3) medium
4) like a she-male

Then for lips:
1) small
2) average
3) large
4) flapping and clapping

Of course, as you mentioned the butt:
1) beautiful little rosebud
2) hot looking donut
3) average
4) like the profile of a basketball

Yeah, now that I think about it it might be a little much.  :)  Or maybe somebody else should come up with the choices ;)

As always, be safe and have fun

woodhands99 5 Reviews 10236 reads
posted
6 / 6

if it's that important to a few, they can ask ... but for me, it takes the magic out of seduction to have too much data!

Register Now!