Write Review
1,979,340 Total Reviews 3,607 New Reviews
7,572 Users Online

Suggestion and Policy

I think any disputed review, based on whether or not the two parties ever met, should be removed.
JackDunphy 389 reads
posted

During the investigative period, and I think 2 weeks is adequate, the guy will need to provide proof that they met.

If no response from the guy in that 2 week period, the review stays out of the db permanently. If he does provide the proof, it gets reinstated.

The system should not be based at all on when a reviewer logs in as he can use that to stall the process and leave bogus info in the db that doesn't do guys or girls any favors.

If a gal abuses the system by consistently disputing reviews that the reviewers prove occired, she should be barred from disputing all reviews in the future. That will make her only dispute reviews she knows to be false.

shad0wwalker911 reads

Please put a disclaimer that if a gentleman writes a review and the provider disputes it, he has two weeks to respond or the review gets pulled. There are too many of us who have disputed reviews sitting up for weeks and months because the reviewers refuse to sign back in. Thank you

ReplyQuoteReport
mrfisher362 reads

between the posting of the review and her dispute with it.

Two weeks for each seems fair

ReplyQuoteReport
JackDunphy390 reads

During the investigative period, and I think 2 weeks is adequate, the guy will need to provide proof that they met.

If no response from the guy in that 2 week period, the review stays out of the db permanently. If he does provide the proof, it gets reinstated.

The system should not be based at all on when a reviewer logs in as he can use that to stall the process and leave bogus info in the db that doesn't do guys or girls any favors.

If a gal abuses the system by consistently disputing reviews that the reviewers prove occired, she should be barred from disputing all reviews in the future. That will make her only dispute reviews she knows to be false.

ReplyQuoteReport
BigPapasan393 reads

...would get two challenges per month.  If the challenge is successful, she would get an additional challenge.

ReplyQuoteReport
mrfisher348 reads

unnecessary roughness, holding, off sides, pass interference, ineligible receiver, more than 11 players on the field (for orgies)

And my favorite:  face mask penalty:  (You know what I'm talking about.

ReplyQuoteReport
MasterZen269 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
MatureGFE311 reads

ReplyQuoteReport
Post Reply Back To Forum
Register Now!