Suggestion and Policy

I don't know about that
swimtrekr 59 Reviews 6343 reads
posted
1 / 11

They can, and I'm sure they do, talk about clients on the provider board.  But, think about it, would you really want reviews of yourself out there for all of us to read?  Especially if you did not turn in the best performance for the provider?  Not so sure I would.

Swim

anon90210 52 Reviews 5963 reads
posted
2 / 11

I think you are on the wrong website.
TER is for reviewing providers who openly advertise, not for reviewing hobbyists. That would be a stupid move that would drive away many hobbyists. I would be the first to go.

little phil 37 Reviews 5062 reads
posted
3 / 11

I bet I could beat you to the door.

There are stupid ideas, and REALLY stupid ideas.  Then there's this one.

MDSTUDS2003 5567 reads
posted
4 / 11
anon90210 52 Reviews 8518 reads
posted
6 / 11
jjrobi 10 Reviews 4504 reads
posted
7 / 11

All the reviews would be the same: "Arrogant, thinks he is god's gift to women . . . small willy, cheap, balding and a poor lover."

craneballs 5766 reads
posted
8 / 11

Where the client reviews here might exaggerate greatly a providers review of the client would probably be spot on but at the expense of that client. We are into fantasy here not reality.

midboss 44 Reviews 4582 reads
posted
9 / 11
j03schm03 12 Reviews 7062 reads
posted
10 / 11

Also to me, this topic just screams: "Personal insecurity" as well as a misunderstanding what this is all about in the first place:

FANTASY.

In terms of insecurities, we all have them: providers, clients, and civvies alike. Just remember that P2P is about fantasy not reality, if you're really curious about your performance, then talk to your SO or wife.  You'll never get the truth from the community (providers & hobbyists alike). Why?

FANTASY.

Read that word, look it up, re-read it, and understand it.

Then read it again, look it up again, and re-comprehend it.

GaGambler 4268 reads
posted
11 / 11

I think some people just wake up in the morning and take stupid pills, I think the OP overdosed on them.

Of course this is the same poster who thinks that corporations are not legal because they are not specifically mentioned in the constitution and that "ALL" corporations should be done away with.

Which one of these two ideas do you think is more stupid??? Tough choice isn't it? lmfao

Register Now!