OK, I am a bit puzzled. There is a new review of a Phx provider named Nicole (192702). The Real Photo and Photo Accurate are set to Yes. The Build is set to Baby Fat. When I look at the linked BP ad, her pics don't look anything to me like what I would consider baby fat. I would probably rate her as Skinny (or Athletic at the uppermost bound). Now, I realize this is a judgment call on the reviewer's part, but, gosh, he must consider skinny to be someone in the final throes of anorexia.
Which leads me to something I have been thinking about for a while. Since reviews include Height, why not also have a Weight, and get rid of the Build entry. That would hopefully remove the ambiguity of what Build means. After all, I'm not sure what the difference between Skinny and Thin is.
I don't have VIP status at the moment (my latest review has been in the queue for five days now!) or I would be PM-ing the reviewer directly about this.
Probably the reviewer just hit the wrong button while filling out the form.
It happens a lot.
I think Baby Fat is a stupid term to describe a body type anyway. Skinny vs thin, yeah that is a hard one too. I guess skinny would be bones showing. Athletic is another one that people misuse. to me athletic would be thin and toned. some people use athletic to describe "bigger" girls, that others would consider "baby fat" I like P411 body descriptions better thatn TERs. Theirs goes like this: skinny, slender, athletic, muscular, average, curvy, voluptuous, bbw, super bbw.
Body type is subjective, but your idea of wieght would never work> How many guys do you think can accurately guess a girl"s weight? I think body type is much easier, but maybe if they switched to something like the p411 descriptions.
As to the girl in question I looked at the review and the pics on backpage. To me I would say athletic or average. Definitely not skinny or thin. See how your opinion and mine differ already? But neither of us see "baby fat." But do you think you can guess her weight? I have a bigger concern about that review though and that is the fact that the guy videotaped the whole session and nowhere does he mention asking her permission. That is definitely not cool if he didn't ask her.
You should just do like mrfisher said and submit a problem report. If the reviewer said the pics are accurate and those are the pics he was referring too, then body should be changed from "baby fat" too....average? athletic?
Baby Fat is the term used for women who are extremely young and haven't matured yet so that isn't even something that should be a choice. As far as I know under 18 is illegal and that is what that term applies to.
It doesn't mean someone who has had a baby or is carrying around a few extra pounds.
I have no idea how that became a body description on TER. I see 45 year olds described as "baby fat" on profiles here. I agree with you that it hould only describe "extremely young girls (not women) Girls who havn't even gone through puberty yet, and of course who should never ever be mentioned here!
baby fat...what the heck?! But in giving it some thought I figured it meant just some fat around the middle. Maybe just a bit of a tummy. It wouldn't be accurate to say she is fat as that tends to make one think it is all over. She may be a good size and shape so looks good but the tummy is there. I don't know how else you could say that without more than one or two words so they settled on baby fat.
"Theirs goes like this: skinny, slender, athletic, muscular, average, curvy, voluptuous, bbw, super bbw."
I 2nd the notion to have better phyiscal descriptors.