TER should come up with a cross reference system so you can search out dual provider reviews.

If you search Name-1, you will get all listings with Name-1:
Name-1  
Name-1 AND Name-2
Name-2 AND Name-1  

If there are no duo entries for Name-1, then she hasn't had a double session reviewed.

If you search the name field for AND, you will get some extra hits for amANDa, cANDy, brANDy and so on but that is how you will also get all doubles entries as "name-1 AND name-2"

Each doubles Profile has it's own Profile ID and does not include the TER ID of Name-1 or Name-2.

What, specifically, did you have in mind?

I'm with Impposter, your post could use some clarification. A few things you may be referring to:

When looking at a duo review, I have often thought it would be super convenient if that profile page had links to each lady's regular profile right there. I'm very far from being the computer hacker type, but my guess is this would require a huge amount of work. Those profiles are created separately and independently by users, with no apparent ties to the original, solo profiles. There isn't even anything in place to let you know which provider is being discussed in the physical description section. Hell, there isn't even a guarantee both providers concerned even have an individual profile. I think those links would have to be created one at a time, but I could be wrong. If you've gotten that far, it's easy enough to search her up by name or phone number, just not as easy as a link on the profile would be.

If you're talking about looking at a profile and wondering if she's ever done a duo and been reviewed for it, just put her name into the search and leave the rest blank except maybe country and city. That will bring up her regular profile and any duos profiles she may be involved in. (It will also bring up anybody else by the same name in your city, but you can weed those out.) If she travels, that could get complicated, as most names return many many results if the city field is set to all.

Yeah, cross referencing the duos reviews would make certain searches a lot easier, but I suspect it's not high on the list of priorities. It's not like we can't get on without it, just gotta work a little harder for it. If I even properly understood what you meant. Haha.

Thanks, I should have been more specific. However, you both figured my question out.
Provider profiles include:
Two girl action ???? OK great but what kind of action are we talking about ?
Will bring a second provider?  it drives me crazy knowing theres a 2nd friend that might be thrown into a mix.
I know that a few of the dual reviews  usually highlight the first escort and sometimes the second one has an honorable mention (website ...etc) innthat profile,
While a little cumbersome it still works, but a true link would be great

The current dbase is pretty much a "yes/no" or "pick ONE item from the dropdown".  There are several criteria that would be better tracked by check boxes: "check all that apply" (and maybe an "[x] other __enter_text_here__").  See my "Toys" suggestion, a few topics further down.

You are asking for more detail that currently cannot be entered except in the verbal details.  

I do not see how it would be possible to maintain anything like "who does she do doubles with" as part of the solo Profile as it can be quite variable or quite extensive.  

Doubles Profiles sometimes have URLs and Phone for BOTH parties but that is totally on the reviewer to include. A lazy reviewer will only paste in info for one or the other.

I think you (OP) just have to search for "really bi" and, if someone of sole or solo interest doesn't have any doubles reviews, that you read her webpages for links to her favorite doubles partners.  As has been mentioned many times, some "really bi" listings are barely so and all you get is some tag team action or the obligatory double bj.

Finding a way to include existing solo TER ID Profile numbers within the doubles review Profile would be useful.  

-- Modified on 4/7/2016 7:19:44 PM

That way the profiles of those doing doubles (or more) could be easily identified by searching for "&" plus a name if you know one.  TER could make the "&" one of the moderator's checks/corrections before approving a review.

Searched today using these connectors:
With = 10 profiles
& = 885 profiles
/ = 16,563 profiles
And = 16,622 profiles

It'd be fairly easy to update the database of names so the 10 profiles using "with" would be added to the 885 using "&" as a connector.  It'd be a little more involved to do the "and" but I'd be willing to spend a few bucks on TER hiring a contractor to do that just so long as we fix the issue going forward so that "&" becomes the standard.  

The "/" symbol is problematic as it is also used to denote someone with two or more possible names.  Likely take a brute force approach of opening each profile to verify.

One wildcard in this is when someone reviews two ladies who already have a doubles review, but he reverses the names.  Poor form on his part for not searching, but then again he'd have had to search the same name at least four different ways.

And yes, I've done a doubles review and know the pain of both searching for related reviews and figuring out the best way to enter my own using existing limits.

Interesting suggestions. I'll just toss in some Qs to muck things up. I mean, TER does need to do some MAJOR updating and upgrading of the review forms, database and so on. That isn't just designing something new, but coming up with policies or standards (such as how to deal with doubles) and to make sure that as much old data as possible is carried over without loss, damage or getting screwed up!  

Maybe there should be a new, SEPARATE review form for duos so you can enter info for each participant?  
In some systems, & is a "special character" so it would have to be clearly defined in the name field to mean what you suggest: a text character signifying a duo Profile. They could also update the dbase and SEARCH function to include or require spaces (not so easy?).  Searching "AND" gets cANDy and brANDy, but searching "_AND_" (space before and after) would only get genuine " AND "s as a conjunction. Best would be an actual data field for DUO SESSION [ ] Yes [ ] No (well, No by default). I hope TER Admin will schedule the TER Summit and Strategic Planning Retreat and that it fits my schedule. I'd be willing to chair some of the Main Discussions and some breakout sessions.  

-- Modified on 4/8/2016 2:52:09 PM