Okay so I'm just a bit curios about some things and I wanted to get you guys take on it...I have noticed that there are a lot of providers not only in the top 100, but in the top 20-30 who only have 5 reviews, and most are not current, some haven't been reviewed in 3-4 months...So my questions are....Do you guys think there should be a certain amount of reviews one should have in order to be eligible for the top 100?
Also, what are your thoughts on the providers who are highly ranked but do not have current reviews and/or only 5?

Thoughts???

-Val

The top 100 is pretty useless.  Since the list is nothing more than a mathematical calculation based on a gal's appearance and performance numbers it stands to reason that the fewer reviews a girl has the easier it is going to be for her to have a higher score.  It works the same way a baseball player's batting average does.  

The rating position means nothing to me. I want to read a gal's reviews and decide if she is a lady that I want to see.

I was told by TER tech support that the women who are on the top 100 are there because they have an average score of 10 between both looks score, and overall experience, and what services they provide. With 10 being the best rating, in order to get that 10, you have to be willing to do things men enjoy most such as no condom. That is scary. I think it should be based on number of reviews, number of views for that city, and whether what was promised was given. I believe that would be more accurate. I do not think under the current system they explained to me the top 100 should be trusted.

i prefer to read the reviews especially the juicy details.

I don't think as anything to do with girls doing the "no condom" thing since most in the top 100 do not care about ter to begin with at least in Vegas in the top 10 I would say 1-2 posts or have anything to do with TER the other just do not participate or ever posted on any forums.