Looking at it again: "In order to keep our performance ratings consistent, we set up the following system: An escort provider may only earn up to a 7, unless she also performs the following during a session: Kisses With Tongue, Bare-Back Blow Job, Really Bi, Anal Sex, or More than One Guy. The addition of each offering will raise her score by one point. If your review doesn't already accurately reflect this rating system, we will adjust it."  

Some of the extras - DFK, BBBJ, Anal - can be easily checked by the client or a series of clients to allow for the occasional YMMV.

But can't a massage girl (7 max) or non-GFE escort (7 max) simply CLAIM to be Really Bi and More than One Guy BUT NEVER ALLOW HERSELF TO BE IN A POSITION TO BE TESTED? Now she becomes a potential 9.  

It's easy enough to come up with excuses to refuse to see someone (F or M) to avoid completing a three-way.  

Shouldn't there be a higher barrier than just a Provider's say-so? Is there already a higher barrier?  


-- Modified on 3/11/2016 9:04:36 PM

Good luck with that.

In the meantime, go with whatever feels right and hope for the best.

...I'm not sure of the consistency of it though.

I was the first reviewer of an agency provider. She was new to the agency and the business. I wanted the profile to be accurate. I asked the lady about each of the services (that I didn't experience with her)  on the profile regarding whether she would be OK performing them if requested. She said she would do more than one guy at a time. She stated she was really into it. I had to take her at her word. TER approved and posted my review but they changed the "more than one guy at a time" to "No" when I had indicated "Yes, really into it." When I questioned them their response was she didn't do it in the session with you. I reminded them their guidelines say she doesn't have to do it in the session being reviewed. I told them I asked her and how else would anyone know but by asking when the provider is new and not reviewed. Their response? She is going to have to do it in a session before we'll change it. Her say-so wasn't enough.

By the way they had no problem with me indicating she was really bi ( she said she was) even though that didn't happen in my session with her either. That "service" remained on her profile.

When a monger tries to file a Problem report to correct a profile they usually ask for corroborating evidence. I've never had a problem getting a Problem Report approved when I had website evidence or several reviews to site.  

My personal opinion on this is there should not be any "extra service" required for a particular performance rating. It's a performance rating not a services rating. If a provider gives the best damn blow job bar none but that's all she does she should get a 10 performance for that best damn blow job. Other info in the review/profile will make it clear blow jobs is all she does.

More than one reviewer has forewarned me that they were only allowed to give me a 9, so I shouldn't be concerned that he wasn't as happy with me as another lady who he'd previously given a 10 as I was just as good if not better..... it was just that he wasn't allowed to give me a 10.  But I currently don't have a duos partner; and I don't do Greek or multiple guys so I'm not eligible for a 10.  So that lowers my best-possible to a 9.  
I get that, so it doesn't bother me at all to receive a 9 from a guy who usually gives out 10s like Halloween candy. LOL.  

While I understand the concept of rewarding providers who go above and beyond, I personally feel each reviewer should be free to score or grade the lady solely by HIS OPINION of the QUALITY of services he received in that session.  

But some folks feel the criteria is loose enough as it is; that 10s should only be given when the lady actually performs activities which make her eligible for a 10, in the session being reviewed.  
In my experience, these are typically the guys who are specifically looking for Greek and/or more of a PSE experience.  

 
Although I'm clearly biased and would love to see the scoring system tweaked, I am well aware that there is no system or solution that is going to make everyone happy.  

xoxoxooxoxoxoxoxoxoxooxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxoxo

...as I have already noted on this issue- there have been occasions where I know for a fact that a provider isn't truly bi, and despite evidence to supporr that, TER refuses to change her profile from "yes- really bi" to either "not really into it" or flat out "no". They base their decision not to change it on previous " successful " 3somes reviews of her, written by guys who have no idea that one (or both) of the providers were obviously not into it but were more than happy to keep that label to increase their rating capability. How many other hobbyists like me are gonna be able to back me up? None! I am one of very few hobbyists that would be able to flag this, yet TER just wants to keep the status quo. Same goes for a provider who claims to be bi but doesn't entertain lady clients - I call bullshit on their being able to keep their bi status if they aren't willing to provide that service to the segment of the population that it specifically references.

I would be surprised as hell if many providers made a lot of false claims about what they offer. Seems like it could wind up causing a lot of drama in session after session. There's always a YMMV aspect to everything on the menu.

What do you do if the profile says her BJs are with condom, but on your date with her she gives you a BBBJ? Would TER allow you to up her "score" beyond what the stayed menu qualifies her for? I don't think they would, and maybe you'd want to check on how she feels about your even including that in a review.

There's a provider who, because of a rare combination of circumstances, has offered to drive over and pick me up tomorrow, drive me to her place, and drive me back home afterwards. I doubt that she'd want me to mention that in a review because she doesn't want a bunch of clients from all parts of town asking for that particular courtesy. "Hey, if she did it for one guy," a lot of guys will say, "Doesn't she have to do it for the rest of us too?"

On the Really Bi or More Than One Guy, for instance, it's easy to picture a provider getting a voicemail that starts, "Hey, me and three of my drinking biddies are looking for gang bang tonight and I see you are into that..." And the provider hears the tone and decides to pass. Did she fail a test? Or was she just savvy about avoiding a bad experience?

Also, if responding to a question about doing doubles she states that, sure she's "Really Bi," does it then necessarily follow that she wants to do one-on-one with lesbian clients? And even if she is open to that, does it mean she has to agree to see EVERY lady client that contacts her?

It seems there are a lot of reasons why a provider will turn down this or that service as well as certain clients but not others. Riming might be on the menu, but if a trick has butt acne, she might draw the line there

My concern focused on rating inflation due to false claims about the two most difficult claims to verify, not every item on the services checklist.

Those two claims can raise the maximum allowable score from 7 to 9. Even though a 7-out-of-7 is a top score and could be the best service ever, a 9-out-of-9 seems like a better top score, even if the "plus" services were declined.   Your examples of YMMV BBBJ, rimming, etc. are the usual things that can sometimes be YMMV. (BBBJ affects max score; rimming does not.) If she claims to provide BBBJ and 10 reviewers in a row note the absence or refusal, it's likely that her menu has changed over time and TER can change her Profile and, I think, adjust the upper limit on future reviews. 5 recent BBBJ + 5 recent CBJ makes it look to be more YMMV. No change.  

But "Really bi" and "More than one guy" are really hard to refute. In fact, they are really hard to even test or challenge. Do you and a buddy want to meet with a massage girl and see if she's really willing to do two guys at once? She can say "yes" and still evade the test at the last minute: NCNS, call to cancel ("I don't feel well today."), "My roommate doesn't want two guys here at the same time.", "I couldn't verify your friend.", ....

My concern was not about every YMMV item. It was about the most difficult to verify items

The clients know what makes up the score and think you must have been awesome to somebody if you have a 9.     You should not even worry at all.     And a beautiful woman to boot.