Why is the detailed Profile section of a review left up to the reviewer and not a primary one first started by the provider?  If someone makes HUGE errors in submitting a review (you can't reach them AND its your 1st review), this can gravely affect a provider's business negatively!!! Everyone searching reviews will see that inaccurate detailed profile first and often determine whether to research further or not just from that 1st profile viewed.

Case in point, my first review profile has 3 HUGE errors. First, I do NOT, and have never smoked cigarettes EVER. Second, I've NEVER spit during/after oral. I have MANY clients and ex-boyfriends to vouch for this. Third, my rates have never been $250.  They are an inclusive $300/hr with multi-hour incentives offered.

All 3 elements can adversely affect one's decision to visit a provider and I've not received assistance from TER support either.

It would be MUCH better if the provider created her profile of details information to ensure accuracy.  If she's lying then the proof will come forward in her review track record.

TER does not allow profiles without any reviews attached to them, that's why providers are not allowed to create their own profiles. If they allow providers to do so, then this website would be full of provider profiles with no reviews attach to them just like an Escort mall.

If there is any discrepancy in your profile you can contact [email protected] and ask Staff to fix it for you.

Thanks so much, but the problem is that I HAVE contacted TER support with no luck.

Allow the provider to flag a review as in dispute and post her side of the story. In theory, it's self regulating. If they post a lot of disputes, that's probably a bad sign (too many "Yes, buts.."). But if it's just one among 30 reviews, the numbers are on her side.

I agree....... at least that way it would be accurate on all counts.  Too many reviewers just guess at the answers to things that hadn't been discussed.  Great idea!

Certain "service" items appeal to a huge demographic of hobbyists but may be repugnant to the particular provider. Allowing the providers to fill out the sexual menu items afforded would be akin to the tired and trite "I'm real open minded" BS found in Craigslist ads.

Some of the items in the reviews need a "Don't Know" option

for example, Anal.  If hobbiest didn't ask for it and it didn't happen and provider didn't offer it then it should be "Don't Know" vice no or yes  

Many things might be like this:  CIM
Not everything is done or requested by everybody every session