Sports Talk

Golf is a crazy sport,Tiger was the best for 10 years, then Rory last year now Phil is the best
cashorcredit 1726 reads
posted
1 / 12

Tiger dominated for years.. now he's just a good golfer, Rory dominated last year he was the best golfer in the world last year.. now he's one of the worst players I've ever seen.

Now 2013, Phil Mickelson in my opinion is the best player in the world right now.. and winning the Open championship just proves it.

BeautywithBrains See my TER Reviews 359 reads
posted
2 / 12
furnsam 29 Reviews 474 reads
posted
3 / 12

Tiger is more than average and is back to #1 in 2013-
2013 FedExCup
Standings through: Open Championship
+/- Events Points Wins
1
Tiger Woods
– 10 2,481.33 4
2
Phil Mickelson
+2 15 2,117.5 2
3
Matt Kuchar
-1 16 2,019.5

cashorcredit 433 reads
posted
4 / 12

Tiger is having a good season.. Phil is having a "great" season.

He has 3 wins this year including a major and.. he could have easily won the US Open!

And rankings mean nothing in golf Rory is ranked #3 right now.. and he's god awful.. Charles Barkley would probably beat him. Tiger maybe ranked #1,  but as of right now Phil is a better player!

BigPapasan 3 Reviews 426 reads
posted
5 / 12

...got slower over the four days, rather than drying out and getting faster as is usual.  He would not admit that it was his fault that his shots kept coming up short.

Somehow Mikkelson figured it out.


-- Modified on 7/22/2013 6:49:17 PM

macdaddy1944 51 Reviews 404 reads
posted
6 / 12

easy one to figure out..Tiger does way too much PHILandering.

earthshined 408 reads
posted
7 / 12

not a good golfer, a GREAT golfer.

What else does he have to do?

hiddenhills 143 Reviews 395 reads
posted
8 / 12

Lefty is one of the GREATS, however, he can make a giant leap into the elite of the elite if he can just win the fuckin US OPEN

Posted By: earthshined
not a good golfer, a GREAT golfer.  
   
 What else does he have to do?

ShakingtheSheets 189 Reviews 369 reads
posted
9 / 12

Phil's career, while its been impressive, does not catapult him into the top ten golfers whomever lived. We have a tendency to rank the players of today (because we see them and they are fresh in our mind) ahead of the greats of yesterday, many of whom played 50-75 years ago. You can't just look at statistics (i.e. major championships) in a vacuum.  For a variety reasons, some of the greats didn't have the same opportunities to play all the majors. Ben Hogan, Byron Nelson, Sam Snead for example rarely competed at the British Open (too costly to travel). Nelson played once, Snead played once (and won), Hogan played once (and won).  Also, these men lost 4 years of the Masters and 3 US Opens due to WWII. Also, players like Gene Sarazen and Walter Hagen for most of their careers, didn't have a Masters tournament to even compete in (wasn't invented). Bobby Jones retired at such a young age, who knows what he could have accomplished.  

I think its fair to put Phil in the top 20 of all time, but as of today, he's not even close to the top ten. He doesn't rank historically with any of these players: Jack, Tiger, Hogan, Jones, Hagen, Snead, Player, Sarazen, Palmer, and Nelson. I didn't even have room for Watson in the top ten (tough omission).  I think Tiger is the only player of the last 25 years who should be even considered for inclusion on this list.  

Right now, I would put Phil's career on par (pun intended) with the likes of Seve, Faldo, Trevino, Billy Casper and Ray Floyd. Still hall of fame great, but just not "front room" hall of fame great.    
 .    



-- Modified on 7/25/2013 12:51:00 AM

earthshined 370 reads
posted
10 / 12
earthshined 361 reads
posted
11 / 12

5 time runner up. the one he really should have won was  a few years ago at Winged Foot

Register Now!