I only see independant ladies.

I don't know exactly why, but I always feel safer using an independent lady. So to answer your question, I do not ignore the lie and I avoid any lady with a hint of agency.

I ignore the ads, I only deal with true independents.
Providers with a booker are also NOT independent.

this was a big beef of mine.  I got fooled once - thought she was an independent than she slipped and told me about her agency rules.

That did it for me, I didn't want anyone other than the lady I see have info on me.

I never saw her again.

There is only one agency I have used knowingly and that's because I know the person behind the operation.

But those days are gone 'cause I've got a sweetie.

Juliet....you are a gorgeous gal.   I hope you are well.

CG

Re: Gents......does it bother you when

Such deception is absolutely a red flag - kind of used to fibs such as incrementing one's birth year* and the like, but the scenario you describe is damn irritating, along with B&S scammers, pic thieves, and the like.

*Interestingly, in a recent RB poll, the majority of respondents seemed to prefer their companions in the 38-45 y/o age range, with 30-37 a second, 25-29 in 3rd place.  Growed up sexy women are The Best!

If Elliot Spitzer stayed with Independents, he would probably still be Governor or New York.  Agencies are trouble waiting to happen. Why in the world would LE be interested in one lady working under the radar for herself? In my experience, Indy's are smart, adventurous, fun people - especially the one who started this thread.

Skibeach

For those providers who aren't independent but don't work through an agency but just a common booker or assistant.

I'm not sure what you would call that:

maybe:  co-dependent