I think I am about to puke.
I have been reviewing Natalie West reviews.
Don't they all sound like the provider wrote them?
The most recent review describes how a client did not have the scented oils (but how would he know they were scented if he had never been there?)  Suspicious to say the least.
Be wary if the review makes the provider sound too good to be true.

I read all of her reviews and I don't think they sound like a provider wrote them.  Most of the reviews were written by members that have written reviews on quite a few other ladies.  And you are wrong about the most recent one also.  It doesn't say she did not have scented oils.  The reviewer stated that she only had scented oils which he apparently doesn't like, so no oil was used.  I find nothing at all "suspicious" about her reviews.  Sedagive.

I agree. I've seen her and all the reviews seem true to my experience with her.

I disagree.  Hi Natalie.
I reviewed her with an honest review giving her good and bad points and it was not posted. Consumer beware!

I guess some folks like her and others don't care for her.
If you like a no-touch session, mechanical massage, no warmth, and no fun ending, she's for you.  My experience has not been like her reviews AT ALL.  I have been emailed by guys based on my previous comments on Natalie West, and they completely agree with me. YMMV!!!

If you actually did read my review of Natalie, then why would you think she wrote it? I gave her an 8/6, meaning hot looking but mediocre service. A rating of 6 won't get many repeat customers. I do agree, however, that the 8 ratings for performance are not at all representative.

She IS a no BS type of girl. She knows just what she is willing to let you get away with. She knows the human body and gives a great therapeutic massage. The day I saw her she told me about the guy she had seen the day before and how he was all hands. She said that she was very turned off by that. The last time I looked she still had an ad on Exotics under escort. So that much I will say isn't right. As for the smiles and happy ending, all I can say is she was very nice to me and I was happy when I left. Respect can sometimes go a long way. She did state to me that as she gets to know someone.. well....

Exactly right on the money accurate...have nothing to add (but will that stop me?).  She has a kinda bossy personality.  A VERY good masseuse, and would see her for that alone, if it was priced appropriately.  Ending as described.  Strong personality, not for everybody.  If you want guaranteed sweetness, see Rhonda.  Be flexible, guys.

C'mon folks, let's have a bit of dignity here. This woman is offering no more than what would be gotten at some legitamate massage joint, like a hotel for instance. She most certainly isn't worth all of the bickering. It's enough already!

Here's a massage provider, very desirable looking, and advertising in SDX. Yet all she provides is primarily a skilled therapeutic massage, with what seems a very mediocre "finish". And then she gets some 8's in performance?!! And then someone like me sees her based on reviews and looks, and comes away feeling like they just wasted $$. This is where it should be exposed and the ones who gave the 8 ratings should jump in to explain why. An awesome therapeutic massage with a great looking lady, but is not at all sensual, should receive no higher than a 6.

I don't think the reviewer needs to explain why he gave an 8 for a hj because it's against the rules in the first place.  It should have been adjusted down before the review was posted.  

What is unclear about the current policy is what must be accomplished to acheive a 7.  Does there have to be fs involved or will a hj do?  The way I read it, to earn a 7 there must be fs.  Anything less than that cannot earn above a 6.

Scores are based differently for a massage only provider as opposed to an escort. Please do not confuse a massage provider with massage parlor girls. Escorts are required to do certain things to get a higher score on performance. Probably best not to discuss it here. However, a massage only provider is not required to do those thing to attain a higher score. We could not expect greek from a provider that does not even provide FS. It's not the best system, but it's what we have.

Sheesh...this constant whining and bitching about the "ratings" and the numbers, that's why there's the "juicy details" section.

Give it a friggin' rest people. Get off your lazy asses and READ the bloody reviews. We've seen guys on TER who's opinions run all over the place, starting with Ness who thinks that every gal in San Diego is a double bagger (look at how he's tried to trash Anna), running up to guys who think street walkers rate perfect 10's.

It's truly a case of opinion. I'm not partial to fiery redheads, so they wouldn't score as high in the looks with me. Nor would the traditional California Beach Bimbo babe. So freakin' what.

The performance ratings have been beaten to death already, but to be honest, who really gives a rat's @$$. Like I said, JUST READ THE BLOODY FRIGGIN' REVIEWS. If a gal doesn't do what you are looking for, the numbers don't mean jack.

Absolutely correct JBIRD.  Thank god the ratings are whole numbers, otherwise people would be quarreling between 6.8 and 6.9 ("If her hair were 1/8" longer, I would have given her a 7.4...")