FYI when I posted my review of Sage I gave her a 10 performance rating as everyone who knows her will agree she deserves (and is authorized by TER guidelines). The accepted report shows a 9. I'll have to submit a problem report to correct this error. I'll assume for now it was something technical I did and is not related to the week it took to get accepted, but I wanted Sage, and anyone else who cares, to know that she earns a 10 in my book and a 12 to 20 if it were possible.

I've already received mail from a fellow hobbyist asking why no 10!!
Hopefully this can be corrected soon.

It now looks like I failed to select some specifics in drop down boxes about kissing and bb, so automatic systems probably triggered an error and that in turn might be why approval took so long, because a human had to get involved  (I'm assuming all this -no reply yet). But hopefully that will be fixed soon.

The moral is to pay close attention to those selection boxes as they apparently automatically validate your rating choices. I was careless.
Hi Sage,
Everyone knows you're a super ten!

I appreciate it all lover!
From the moment we connected to this wonderful exclamation of pleasure.
I thank you for your kind heart and wonderful words!!
Until we meet again to begin the next chapter in our love story ...
Kissez everywhere it pleases you
Sage

Nice review.  Glad you caught it. For better or for worse, with this new list system, every point counts.

same thing happened to me when I reviewed Autumnrayne...gave her a 10 but it was reduced to a 9!

So get it fixed.