San Diego

Very good points, mi amigo!
Que Pasa 1008 reads
posted

The other gal the reviewer has seen is also from the same agency.  His review(s)do not pass the sniff test. Besides, the chica looks TGTBT!

The first thing that drew my attention is the link to an agency I did not recall noticing before.  I did a “searchbug” on the phone number and found it is a Utah landline.

Next I clicked on the reviewer’s handle.  The only review other than this one is a 2006 review of a Salt Lake City provider.  And, suspiciously, both providers were rated 10 in appearance.

Then I read the review.  It says nothing to connect the gal to San Diego, such as she had advertised on Craigslist.  It simply says he saw the agency had a new girl and he called.  Why would a guy presumably located in San Diego call a Salt Lake City agency?

Except for the statement that CBJ usually doesn’t work for him, it sort of smacks of a quick advertisement rather than a review.  In fact, what surprises me is that such a short review was approved by TER.  I had a recent review that had probably twice was much in “juicy details” that was rejected on first submission as not having enough detail.  (I added more detail and it was then approved.)

Next I checked the agency’s website.  It claims they are Utah’s number 1 escort service.  Nothing states that providers are located in any other area.

I look at Shar’s photos.  I notice a sizeable tattoo on her right hip, shown in two of her photos.  The review profile says “don’t know” for tattoos.  I’ll admit that one or two gals I have reviewed may have had small tattoos around their ankles that I did not notice.  But I have never given a 10 in appearance.  I think if I was considering a 10 rating for a provider I was experiencing, I would give her a good look-over to make sure she really deserved a 10.  This guy gave her a 10 but did not notice a tattoo on her hip?  A hip tattoo is pretty much staring you in the eye whether you are performing oral or full sex, doesn’t it?

Next I searched for posts on this discussion board and the Other Cities Board (there is no Salt Lake City Board) back 900 days.  No posts by this guy.

Then I read his earlier review of the Salt Lake City provider.  Also reads more like an ad rather than a review.  Next I went to that gal’s profile and guess what: the phone number is this agency’s phone number.

My take on this: the “reviewer” probably owns the Salt Lake City agency and is promoting his gals.

What I can’t figure out is why Shar would be listed as providing in San Diego and Palm Springs.  I do not recall seeing her advertise on CL or one of the local provider boards.

Any of you vets want to take a swing at this one?

-- Modified on 10/31/2008 2:01:54 AM

Que Pasa1009 reads

The other gal the reviewer has seen is also from the same agency.  His review(s)do not pass the sniff test. Besides, the chica looks TGTBT!

arnold1242 reads

I agree w your points.  when ever your intuition kicks in and red flags show up.  Save your money and your time and go elsewhere.  So many girls, I never waste time on suspicious reviews.  Not worth it.

it didn't look right to me either way too short for someone that suposedly rocked his world

Register Now!