hello all, my question is you got bbbj, and cbj, and i know the difference between the two, but when you go covered for the rest on out, vs uncovered, doesnt it seem kinda.........redundant?  for example, things being exchanced in bbj especially with cim and cbj, then you think about dfk/lfk, what is the point of a condom at all right?????  and its not that i like one vs the other, i am mostly a fbsm guy who is an extraordinarily huge clean freak and hypochondriac. so as much as i do and would appreciate a bbbj from someone i may or may not know, it does kinda make me wonder the safety issues following that have a sense of purpose.

much love and respect.

The Bbbj give the opportunity for cim, which is the best. Have a girl suck me dry on a regular basis might get her a new car

I agree with you both.  Awesome post to start the day thanks for sharing!

This is a question that has been beaten to death over the years on this board, and is probably best addressed elsewhere. Short answer is yes -- the risk of contracting something bad from a bbbj exists, and is increasing (see last week's New Yorker article on the worldwide spread of antibiotic-resistant gonorrhea, which lives very happily in the throat).

quote : samick528 : hello all, my question is you got bbbj, and cbj, and i know the difference between the two, but when you go covered for the rest on out, vs uncovered, doesnt it seem kinda.........redundant?  for example, things being exchanced in bbj especially with cim and cbj, then you think about dfk/lfk, what is the point of a condom at all right?????  and its not that i like one vs the other, i am mostly a fbsm guy who is an extraordinarily huge clean freak and hypochondriac. so as much as i do and would appreciate a bbbj from someone i may or may not know, it does kinda make me wonder the safety issues following that have a sense of purpose.

much love and respect. : quote :