San Diego

TER REVIEW
tbrown7399 17 Reviews 2789 reads
posted

YOU KNOW, I SAY A PROVIDER BASED ON HER REVIEWS AND A SPECIAL SHE WAS RUNNING.  WHEN I WAS HONST ABOUT THE SESSION.  TER DID NOT APPROVE MY REVIEW.  SO, I TONED IT DOWN AND POSTED IT AGAIN.  AGAIN, IT WAS NOT POSTED BECAUSE I DID NOT PUT ENOUGH INFO.  SO I TONED IT DOWN AGAIN, GAVE MORE DETAIL AND A MORE APPEALING REVIEW.  IT WAS NOT APPROVED FOR OTHER.

ISN'T THIS A REVIEW BOARD WHERE A MEMBER CAN POST REVIEWS HONOSTLY OR WHAT.

Staff2667 reads

Well... since the subject of honesty was brought up....


You submitted a review of this provider on 3/22/2004 giving her a 5 / 6..

You submit another review on 4/8/2004 giving the same provider a 3/2

On  5/2/2004 You give the SAME provider another review giving her a  2 / 2

Each review starts with "I HAVE BEEN WAITING TO GET WITH HER FOR A LONG TIME, JUST BASED ON HER REVIEWS."

I am curious how the provider has gone from a 5/6 to a 2/2 when supposedly you have only seen this provider once?


-- Staff

I recently had a similar experience.  I wonder if we saw the same provider?  I saw a gal who mostly gets 8's and some 9's.  Pretty consistent.  Plus, Amber Grey recommended her.  When she announced a special on the local board, I jumped on it (figuratively).

Upselling is a real turn off for me, so when I found out after we started that kissing was $50.00 extra, I was disappointed.  $300 was plenty for my hour with her (her driver was very prompt), so I didn't inquire about additional charges (i.e., hand holding: $3.00;  licking ear: $5.00;  rubbing thigh: $7.00; CBJ/BBBL $???, etc.) for additional services.

My first inclination was to write no review, recalling the adage, "if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all."  However, I decided I ought to forewarn my fellow San Diego hobbyists about the upselling.  I wrote a lackluster review of our lackluster session, giving straight sevens that I thought were generous and fair.  Staff disapproved it for lack of juicy details ((Staff, please correct me if I'm wrong)).

Of course, there WERE no additional juicy details.  I mean, I really wish there were, but it wasn't a "juicy" session.  The main characteristic of the session was the upselling that was not disclosed in advance.  It totally undermined my enjoyment of the session (read: turned me off completely).  

I struggled with the review.  On the one hand, I wanted to advise the community about the upselling.  On the other, I didn't want to unfairly deprecate the lady.  Maybe it was a "YMMV" experience, who knows?  

-- Modified on 5/10/2004 12:04:21 AM

Staff3218 reads

I think you missed the point GotRythm.  He supposedly saw this provider once yet has 3 sets of scores.  

-- Staff

Hi Staff,

You may very well be right.  It WAS a little hard to follow due to several typo's...  His last line was "ISN'T THIS A REVIEW BOARD WHERE A MEMBER CAN POST REVIEWS HONOSTLY OR WHAT".

Therefore, I thought he was questioning whether you were blocking his truthfull review of a particular lady.

Obviously, you wouldn't do that.  It would defeat the whole point of TER.

From Tbrown7399's post, it sounded to me like he first ran afoul of the "no denigration" rule ("PLEASE BE WARNED: We will not post any review that slams or denigrates a provider").  

It seems his next attempt had too few details to support his numeric rating?

The answers I THINK he needs from Staff, at this point, are:

 (1) Yes, you can post honest reviews,
 (2) provided they're reasonablly civil,
 (3) and contain sufficient detail to support the numerical rating given.

My $.02

He'd have no luck at all.

Wow, except for Jenni (of course) and a couple others this guy has had a below average experience in the hobby. Hard to believe he's still wasting his money!

From personal experience I can see why a date may drop from a 5/6 to a 2/2 in retrospect. I actually tried to be nice to a girl once and she ripped me a new one after she read it, even a year later she emails me to give me shit. I should have been much more blunt back then cuz I'm sure some poor fucker has seen her thinking "a 5 or 6 isn't always bad." But this girl had a face scrubbed by low grade sandpaper and an even more abrasive attitude.

I've had this happen before also. It's a shame...but it's not a democracy. Ypu're stuck with their rules no matter how subjective.

Honestly...if the approval staff is trying to see to it that a cetain lady's reviews remain consistent...then its no wonder I had so many, "what the hell? That was an 8/8 provider????"

To the staff: I think us guys can sort out the bullshit reviewers ourselves, if you dont see an obvious outright lie in the review, then post the damn thing. I personally feel there are way too many guys in here rating mediocre ladies as 6 and above in looks. Its rare that a 6 or above provider gets a review below that. I think its becuase he knows the staff wont post it, so he ups her score.

I dont know about you guys, but I want honesty. You tell me what you really felt was happening and how you felt about it, and what YOU think she looks like, and I will determine if I trust you or not. I think this whole thing stinks (or should I say "hole" thing?)

Just my opinion.

Staff3618 reads

I must have done a really bad job trying to get my point across.  For that I apologize.  Supposedly, this guy saw the provider once.  How come there are 3 different sets for scores for one visit?  

-- Staff

I hope you sent a private message to Staff a few times before posting publicliy against him.

Well Everyone:

I seem to have caused an earthquake on the continental drift.  Gotrythm nailed it:  Plese be WARNED: we will not post any review that slams or DENIGRATES a provider.

On 3/22/04 I "TRIED" the review in question with a 5/6 but,I was very detailed in my review and very honest.  TER unapproved it and commented it as other.  Now, what does other mean?  On 4/8/2004 I "TRIED" to repost it by toning it down but give it true number score.  TER statused it a unapproved commented not enough detail.  On 5/2/04 I again "TRIED" to post the same review with a little more detail, I got the number wrong.

Thanks gotrythm, scampr, hhhumper and jmy68 for the input.  As for wannaplay teacher.  If you saw what I saw, my ATTITUDE does not need work.  Just by you making that statement, puts your attitdue in question.  You are prejudging someone just by one post.  As for my spelling, your right, I can't spell worth a lick.  So, thank you for your order and PLEASE drive through and keep going.  At least I am tring to be honest with myself with others and still get my nut at the same time.  

Thank you very much for your time and have beautiful day.

Register Now!