Who are the most reliable reviewers on TER.

MfSD is an excellent reviewer. In addition to being a connoisseur among hobbyists, he provides a lot of detailed, accurate information in his reviews.

Many Thanks Suzanne, and welcome home. I hope your vacation was pleasant.

It always helps of course when the lady who you are reviewing (particularly in your case), rocks your world. MfSD.

I don't recommend you go by any particular reviewer. Each has his own taste. I know that I have given some providers high marks while others have given them low marks and vice versa. I believe that the individual may rate on what he wanted and what he actually got. If he wanted a waif and the provider had a medium build, he may be tempted to put her down as baby fat. I know of one provider that is admittedly larger than most that I found to be beautiful. Not hot or sexy. Just beautiful and vuluptious. (I wish I had spell checker here.LOL) Lie I stated earlier, it depends on theindividuals tastes at that particular time. I hope I said that right. I suggest doing a search and going for the provider that meets your standards with the most reviews. Just my 2 cents.

I don't know what to say. Being singled out twice in the same thread, particularly since I've been pretty much laying low on this board...........MfSD.

Are you sure you want to go by a reviewer who gives high marks to everyone, and one who the providers adore?

No knock on Marco - as I am suire he is a great person - but notice that too many reviewers give 9s and 10s to ladies that really should not be given any more than 5s and 6s. I have been burned by this so many times.

Why do I say this? Because all of the provider's rates are more or less the same (to within $50), so they should be judged on roughly the same scale.

Now, if a so-so looking provider only charged according to their looks, then maybe you could give her higher performance marks... but definitely not in the looks department.

If you guys want to see who I would give a score of 8 or maybe a 9 to in this area? Check out Bella at apresvous.com. Her performance was OK (about a 6, maybe a 7 considering the $$$$$), but her looks were better than any other provider that advertises in this area (I think she is a solid 8, maybe a 9).

Thanks for the input. I was trying to stay away from reviews that might actually have been posted by a provider or someone "schilling" for a provider.

Is Bella now available? I called Apresvous about six months ago and they said she was no longer available. Ness you got a inside info?

You recommeded a girl that you say is a 6 in performance, but because of her looks she's the bomb?

I don't know Ness, I think most guys are going to go the other way on this one.

$$$$$ for a 6 in performance is a hard sell.  Guys can have a 6 (nice time) in a topless bar for less money.

But it's nice to know that a girl that hot would only get an 8 from you.  Kinda lets everyone know where your scale compares to others.  You're like the Simon Cowell of Escort Reviews. (Not a bad thing since he doesn't blow smoke up people's butts)

Any 10's that you know of?

the act of truthfully reporting what occured during a particular period of time, between a client and a provider. Nothing more, or less, and no indication of what any other client is going to recieve, only what they might expect.

The fact that my performance scores are very high generally is a reflection of the great service I have recieved.

There was a thread on another board concerning provider appearance. Personally I have never given a 10 in that category, because I have never been with an escort that looked like(in no particular order) Miss America, Pam Anderson, Brooke Shields, a young Sophia Loren, etc. Now you say, well I don't consider Pam Anderson to be a 10. And my response, exactly, it's all subjective.

But there are several ladies that I've seen that rank high in charecteristics that we consider to be generally attractive, i.e. great body, lustrous hair, sharply defined features, etc. Also, I am generally comparing the ladies I have seen to each other and other known escorts that I haven't seen, not some arbitrary standard of beauty that can not be quantified.

Last, schilling is not something I do, care to do, or need to do. MfSD.

I gave her a 6, maybe a 7 for performance because I factored in the extremely high cost. I would have rated her slightly higher had the cost either been $ or $1/2 less or had she performed more like a GFE/PSE.

Had I known her service was going to be basic, I would have had second thoughts. But you never know till you try...

In any event, guys pay this much for far less in looks. She is almost worth it for that alone, she's got an almost perfect behind.

I called some months ago but she was not available. Two weeks ago, she became available.

She had indicated that she may or may not stay in this town, so I have no idea of her current status.

In my very humble opinion, the ratings are a glimpse at a provider given the subjective nature of opinions, likes, dislikes, turn-ons, turn-offs and past experiences. I have said before for Me what is important is the Passion. I would take a Passionate encounter with a provider who ranked a 7 in looks over a provider who ranked a 10 in looks with no Passion any day. I was not always like this. I used to go for Only the Trophy "10" women and if they acted like an ice queen that was the trade off. Everyone is looking for different things and I believe that is what makes the board so valueble. Not just to avoid the rip-offs, but also to have a glimpse at the variety and have a better chance at a match for what I'm looking for. I wish there was a rating for how passionate the encounter was. Maybe I'm alone, but in many cases it's not Just about the sex it's about that Animal Passion that revolves around the sex.