recently there have been a large number of first reviews posted by first-time reviewers?  On the current page alone, I count five:  Skye, Diamond, Kandi, Victoria, and Kaylin Winters.  The purported review for the latter (at $1400 for 2 hours) does not remotely sound like a review; it reads like an advertisement.  

It seems to me there are two possibilities: 1) a lot more women trying the biz; or, 2) despite local governments' financial difficulties, there are too many law enforcement officers spending time on the computer rather than protecting us from "hard" crime.  

Any vets here want to offer an opinion?

agree.  if I choose to see someone with less than less thatn five reviews I screen them more than they screen me, esp when we meet.  I've dropped a jackson on more than one table and just left if it did not feel right.  Why bother?  You get home and after a few minutes work you say "no what the f... was than all about?"

as for phony reviews, they better live up to it or they will get royal slammed pretty fast and that's the end of that

another fantasy impression from Henri

from the prices they are publishing they must have gold holes.  Don't think they'll get much play here charging LV or LaJ prices!!

I sent a similar post yesterday and it has not shown up yet.  Who in their right mind would see an unreviewed provider for their first review.  One possibility is the hobbyist is doing phony reviews to get a free membership.

wouldn't presume to clasify myself as a vet, but I have noticed similar instances - multiple new girls with very similar great reviews from one or two "reviewers".  definitely a red flag!

There is another explanation possible for why a solid provider may only have one review and it is a reviewers first posting.

If the first time reviewer does not have a second reveiw posted, then he has not done it to get a VIP membership.

At some point you have to allow for new people to join the ranks, both providers and hobbyists.

She could be worth every penny of what she is charging.

I have noticed that the entre level rates have certainly gone up.....I haven't seen many $$ newbie girls out there lately.

Of course, there is another reason why a new solid provider might have only a couple of reviews, but you VIPs will have to email me directly for more details.

It would save time if, when listing reviews and reviewers, it could have the number of reviewers reviews:

Carla (4)
     bigfoot (7)
     yankthis (24)
     pullmyfinger (13)

Then the stings and shills would be obvious:

MsPiggy (3)
    KKreme (1)
    smellslikebacon(1)
    putobitch(1)

Since this is all database driven, it would be so easy to add this feature.

Pu-leeeeeze can we have this?

-- Modified on 9/1/2005 8:46:50 AM

a fantasy AND the real deal.  Love ya madly.