San Diego

Re:Complete BS...
sandiego2 1 Reviews 3893 reads
posted

Or cops a plenty...

Que Pasa4501 reads

Anyone else picking up some real strange vibes on this new review or is it just me?

but nothing else.  I'm not rushing to the phone to call her.

gonna wait a few and see if she is really legit....

Dascook3687 reads

The Review did seem to me more of a Tout vice a Hobbyists review. I googled the phone number: Nothing. The Email on her site leads to daddyssecret2004 on yahoo. (This is not mentioned in the review.) The Yahoo profile associated with daddyssecret2004 is effectively blank and was last modified 1/13/04.Raw data aside, I simply dont get the happy feeling on this one. I'll probably stay clear unless better reviewed. (By one with more Cajones than I) Its entirely possible she could be legit... But I'm not gunna tete the chance... Yet.
                               Just My $0.02USD,
                                                 -Das

Its obviously fake and should be pulled.  Pimps-a-Plenty!

Valerie's review is not in the wrong place nor is it "bogus."

If you looked closely at the provider reviews, you will find that TER mostly locates a provider where the provider has first been reviewed if there is no phone number/area code for primary location purposes. In Valerie's case, that was here is in S.D. although she hails from Canada. For example, Ciera's reviews are listed in Chicago although she is from Washington State.

As far as the veracity of the actual reviewer, I cannot comment directly on it but I will note that Valerie was a lovely young lady with very nice attributes and skills and his review is in line with the other reviews for Valerie. No "red flag" there!

Instead of "sniping" those of us on these boards, perhaps you should go out and get get yourself some. It may make you a kinder person and give you something to do with your spare time.

check out the city and then justify your personal attack... the review should have been posted in the Boston area.

Click on the reviewer's city, and you will see it is Boston, NOT SD.

Valerie has not been in SD for several months, while this agency oin Montreal has indeed been active Boston/SF/NYC...

So before getting self righteous, read up!!

otherwise you would see just how providers are located for purposes of TER. Valerie was first reviewed here in San Diego. Thus, TER has located her in San Diego even though her last review was in Boston. You might want to ask Staff why this is done that way.

BTW, I wasn't commenting on why or how TER does it, but merely responding to your erroneous post wherein you accused Valerie and/or her reviwer of being bogus. Nothing could be further from the truth. The only one who is "bogus" is you for making the great leap of conjecture without having any facts or basis. Your are the one that "needs to read up" you self-righteous reactionary dork!!


-- Modified on 2/5/2004 8:32:51 AM

I must say, what an articulate retort. Are you sure you're a John!

Pecker

You know, Ness, if you were right (for once) I would graciously conceed the point, but NOOO!! You are so damned wrong!!

Don't disparage providers and posters until you get your complete facts straight. Also, stop resorting to cheap shots and name calling to cover up you lack of correct information when someone calls you on it. It makes you look more pathetic than you all ready are. Besides, my so-called "attack" was not gratuitous... you "earned" it!



-- Modified on 2/5/2004 2:08:41 PM

total BS without a doubt.  i met her & sent her away in about 5 minutes.  quotes 600 for 2 pops & cbj only.  wouldn't negotiate a bit.  she is cute & petite but i could tell immediately that her service would be very poor due to her stand offish attitude.  sent her away & didn't give her a dime.  she had a driver in a gangsta car & said he was into guys.  wouldn't risk it with this one myself.  didn't post a review because i thought it was just my gut feeling but now after this fake review i'm very glad i saved my $.

Yep, it's sounds fishy.  Her first review and the first review he's written.  I'd be very suspicious.  Sedagive.

I am almost to the point where I do not call anyone that hasn't been reviewed at least 1 times by an established member.  I do try someone new every so often just to keep things rolling for all of us.

Que Pasa3789 reads

Moreover, there a new review of "Nikki" right above hers that also doesn't look quite right. Any thoughts?

-- Modified on 2/5/2004 2:32:21 PM

This is not the same review that got deleted before as he states that he went back to her for a second time.  The price on the profile also changed from $600 to $500.  As this is the only woman this guy has reviewed and he has given her such high marks twice, there's no doubt in my mind this guy is a shill.  

As far as the Nikki review goes, it just sounds like she was working here from OC/LA for a day or so.  The marks aren't high enough for it to be too suspicious.

Que Pasa3258 reads

I assume that due to the higher level of sophisticated hobbyists & posters at TER, the number of decoys and suspect posts here are generally kept to a minimum, but you should see the various "alert" posts on the non-TER discussion boards about bogus providers and reviewers.

There is a whole listing of suspected reviewers & providers posted on those other boards. It seems "they" are posting bogus reviews of bogus providers in an attempt to provide some legitamacy to themselves. You can never underestimate these people; you can only educate yourself in order to protect yourself.

Register Now!