The setup was seamless.  I arrived on time; she was 5 minutes late.  The door opened, I stepped in the room, and Victoria asked me to leave.  It looks as if Victoria has an age restiction. End of date.

-- Modified on 11/18/2016 12:18:35 PM

-- Modified on 11/18/2016 12:21:11 PM

How old are you if you don't mind me asking?

I'm sorry that happen to you, I don't have any age or ethnic restrictions . "Hugs" your way Tungofun4u xoxoxo

64 years old, triathlete "in recovery", white, with all my hair.
I took a chance and was insulted and humiliated by an agency and provider that profess, "We guarantee that you will experience a first class and professional service at all times.", on the agency's wesite.  Blah, blah, blah!

-- Modified on 11/18/2016 1:21:35 PM

F*ck that agency!

In my intro comm with a new lady, I always include my age to ensure no misunderstandings on that issue. Fine with me if she has an age cutoff, as I just move on. Better to have it out there up front rather than having a bad experience as you did.

Isn't this a completely illegal discrimination in service provision? You can sue them for every penny they are worth - have you contacted a lawyer, EEOC

Dude, that blows. You would think that if it were potentially a problem that her or her manager would cover that in screening.  

For the price, It probably wasn't worth her bullshit anyway.

I'm sorry you encountered such an unfortunate and rude circumstance!

Chivalry is not dead, nor is impeccable manners, grooming, compassion,
as well as passion!  Nothing compares to a seasoned lover, which is generally
experienced with an older gent!  Bebesitos!

Angelina Jones
"Inamorata"

-- Modified on 11/18/2016 8:45:45 PM

I always give age and ethnicity.

The privilege of introducing many young women to the joys of fine wine and seasoned wood.

It will be the dumbest fucking lawyer on the planet.

The agency/booker had my age via the P411 request and all communication prior to the date was through the agency.  It appears the issue had not been discussed with the provider.  C'est la vie.

Done, but may not be accepted as no Benjis exchanged.

Can't you tell us her name here?  Or include a link to their site?  This is all pointless without that info.

Omg read again the headline

And it was not approved as, "The Erotic Review is for reviews of a sexual nature.  We do not consider your review as a review of a sexual nature as no sex act were exchanged between you and the provider."
I haven't figured out an angle to overcome this objection.  Anybody with ideas?

Here's the TER ad I responded to.

END OF MESSAGE

So by their own rules you should be able to submit one (especially since they approved a review where no meeting took place but the guy wasn't refunded the deposit siting it was useful information for users). I'll try to find the review and PM you to try to get a review approval for this awful behavior.

 
If a guy can write a review where nothing happened (i.e. a rip-off or bait/switch) then you certainly should be able to submit and be approved for this type of behavior. You essentially waste your time and efforts to be insulted and degraded. The review SHOULD stand but sometimes TER had "relationships" with some users so they can manipulate their system... We've seen it: an honest review goes up then POOF gone the next day.

https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/showReview.asp?Review=1920409

 
No meeting happened for most recent review yet they approved it
But guidelines state (quote) "Each review must recount a visit that took place within the last three months in order to be timely." As found on review FAQ here: https://www.theeroticreview.com/info_policies/reviewFAQ.asp

 
I strongly suggest fighting for this one
I have never heard of such petty rejection  

 
Then again that agency looks like a joke. And she does't speak much english? Can you say trafficked? Seriously look at their site how can women who look like that be 300/hour with an agency who gets a cut (or more)?

Try googling "matchlessbc +Victoria" and tell me what you find.

The best thing we can do as a community when bad situations like this happen is let as many of us know as possible, to include her name and agency (if she uses one).  That is essentially the whole point of this website, right?

Now, everybody should be aware to avoid this time wasting agency and especially this discriminating provider.

You're kidding right?

Scrolled down to the 11/16 ad by matchlessbc you would have been able to find the info For the agency and seen the link to Victoria'S TER profile. Easy Peasy.  

That's way too much work.  If I can't find it immediately, I move on.  It's almost 2017; they should be searchable.  But knowing that's their username and not the name of the agency helps a little.

END OF MESSAGE

will be approaching the door.   I am also not discriminate with race, nor age,
though I am indeed discriminate with references.  

@Coeur-de-lion, I'm sure you're not only a connoisseur of fine wine, and aged wood,
however seasoned humor, and immense intelligence...I gather this intel only from
seeing your posts.

Two way street....

That sh@t needs to be stated in the ad, not hidden in a friggin' proflie. Time waster. Up front babe, dont screw with my time or patience...

She would have rejected me too.

Looks like she started in August.  Still a newbie.

I, too, have taken to putting it right up front: my age and nationality.  But I haven't run into any rejections.

No act performed, just a cash grab. I assume TER will clarify that it's different as you were only out time and not cash.

For what it's worth, you did the readers of the San Diego board a great service.

For the benefit of those of us a bit younger, did you have the presence of mind to obtain what her age cutoff limit is?

I considered the issues of TGTBT and trafficking.  
I didn't expect Victoria to look like she does in the agency's photos.  I can think of only one provider who used to "show it all", face-torso-pussy-ass, and looked exactly like her photos, Keiki.  Other ladies come close but conceal to some extent various features.  Considering that Victoria in the flesh was not as attractive as on the agency web page, with her listed services, and the number of clients she would see in a day, not "low volume", I thought $300/hour was an appropriate cost of service.  
Trafficking?  That's a possibility after all LA is replete with eastern Europeans who don't speak much English, trafficked?, and I've been burned there, see my review of Alice.  Nevertheless, I acted impulsively after Victoria's ad went up on TER and was 'set up like a bowling pin'.  Mea culpa.

as long as they let potential clients know those restrictions in advance!

I am perfectly OK with providers who list "No fatties" or "No old men" in their ads. I understand it. I am a compulsive overeater and morbidly obese. I am also over 65.

Who wants someone like me whom looks like a elderly human-walrus chimera trying to hump them in doggy with a big roll of fat sitting on their butt? Or - God-forbid - having a geriatric obese monster want to screw in missionary and all the time having to worry that I'm going to have a heart attack and collapse on them, pinning them to the bed.

I am very thankful to the providers who will see me

I know, I would have been. It's much better than spend time and money with someone who is disgusted or repulsed by you. Now you can go and spend 300 on someone who will enjoy your company.

More likely to "pretend" to enjoy your company... but fair point.

So I posted a link under her ad back to this thread so that others may be advised.

If she's bitter like that it may have been for the best. I have turn away people for being to intoxicated and hyggine. I love old guys but scared I might break them lol

With your outstanding measurements I would think the worry would be they would smother.

I would tell her wait till she gets old and someone does that to her.  Thats really hurtful of her to do that.  What a bitch.

Maybe I just made the cut (50)...but she was one hell of a good time