I thought the modirator reviewed our reviews. Any review that was so far off from the norm got kicked backed and not posted. If this is true How did Austin get a review posted that indicated she kissed and provided a massage. This from a girl who takes your money and claims you can not touch as that is prostitution and she does not break the law.


Check out the reviewer  only one and its hers. I wont be suprised if he gives Briggit a nice review toooo

Wrong! The local moderator for this board is not responsible the the reviews in this area also. TER staff has that job. As to how it got through? I can only guess that staff is very busy and it slipped by. Nobody is perfect. Feel free to file a problem report with staff. If thay feel that your concerns are valid, they will pull the review.

-- Modified on 1/20/2003 7:59:37 AM

A problem report has already been filed, and I would expect it will be resolved soon. Staff has a very good record in cleaning up their database.

I know I'm not popular - don't post often.  But, Austin does offer a "little more" than she used to offer.  Can't you guys let it go!?!  Okay, okay.  She SHOULD advertise in the massage section.  And, even though she's 37, she's still pretty hot.  At least for an old fart like me!

so "a little more" as you claim, does this mean she stands 4 feet away instead of six?  Have you experienced her offering a little more?

Austin and Brigette are a couple of the biggest teases in town.


NOTE FROM MOD: DO NOT use a providers real name!

-- Modified on 1/19/2003 8:44:51 PM

To answer your question about letting it go, the answer is no.

The gripe that we all have with Austin is that she should be advertising in the "dancer" section of escort sites, not in either the "escort" or "massage" sections. She and her gal-pal Bridgette have unilaterally attempted to define the term "escort" to mean look but don't touch. If you want that, you're better off going to Deja Vu, or some such.

Besides, I have the feeling that most of the posts indicating that she does more than "dance" are probably self-posts. Undoubtedly, Austin and Bridgette are hurting for business along with the rest of the economy; I think that's just too bad. These ROB's give San Diego and providers a bad name, and an even worse time for their victims.

Yes, I've experienced quite a bit more.  Thanks for asking!

To update the board on the current "Austin" situation, Staff has moved the latest positive review to the rest of her largely negative reviews, under the richly-deserved "RIP-OFF" banner.

In the face of a few positive comments for Austin (see above), why is it statistically accurate to still label Austin as a "RIP-OFF"? For the 45 reviewers in TER who have graded her performance, the mean value is 2.16 or "I should have stayed at home." The standard deviation for this mean value is 1.63, which means that less than 5% of reviewers have rated Austin's performance as a 6 or "nice time". Or alternatively 95% of the reviewers did not have a "nice time" with her, and very likely want their money back.

Or still another way of saying, is that anyone who had a "nice time" with Austin is a statistical outlier. Congratulations are in order, but it doesn't make up for the much larger group of dissatisfied customers.

-- Modified on 1/20/2003 1:50:10 PM

So how come you haven't posted a review?  Or are you her boyfriend?  Or is this just all a figment of your imagination, or are the other 45 people wrong?

Hard to believe that you really have experienced more without having some credibility