The names have been changed to protect the innocent. (Dragnet serca: 1960)I got an e-mail today from a provider asking for my help. I cannot pass up the opprotunity to help a damsel in distress.I seems som a**hole has posted a review on the site tat is not true. I think he may have missremembered his encounter. She is in dire distress because of his callous disreguard for the truth and her desire not to be reviewed.So, don't believe all you read on these reviews. The 'BIG(little)MEN' who are posting them may not remember correctly what went on in the session.I am so pissed, I don't know what else I can do.

I have found several that I suspect are bogus.  Particularly one of whom I personally know.For one, the reviewer's account of the details matched the rest of the others in terms of the extent and quality of the provider's services, and the girl was the right one .... except that she had been living in New York for the past several months contrary to the reviewer indicating that he saw her last month in LA... hmmm.Secondly, I have seen several girls based on these reviews only to find the so called "8", "9", and "10" model materials to be overweight, overage, and not up to snuff.  I understand that it is a subjective evaluation, but if a provider posts one set of physical dimensions, and she is in fact another (usually much heavier, much larger, and several years older), I expect those to match.  Afterall, I am paying her with real money, not something that is going to be worthless the next day.In short, I wish you uys would be a bit more scutinizing when it comes to the looks department.  If a "model type" girl is posted, I expect to appear like those that are, infact, MODELS!!

Da-mac your alright in my book. Have a nice day!

There's no way I can see to know if a review is manufactured by the girl, or result of a jerk's vendetta.