I like both, I like a mix of fantasy and reality
what I hate is candids where the lady has parking lot feet, or the bedroom is a real mess

I like real pictures, but yes a mix is probably the best. You need to have the sexy pictures, but a picture of a provider in a sun dress or something casual is usually what I will look and remember with after we have had our time. The thing is, I am gonna get all your clothes off and I will be paying attention to what I get to see so I don't need to see too many of the over the top sexy shots....but yes some are needed.

The topic does come up a lot on various boards, and there are many who feel as I do. However there are many that prefer the pro or glamour photos, so as the "seller" in order to appeal to the largest number of consumers, it is probably best for a provider to have a mixture of both types on her site. (unless she is trying to appeal only to a select clientele.

My reasoning is that I want the pictures to look exactly like the lady I am going to see. There is a lot better chance if that happening if the pics are candid, amateurs. Digital cameras and even the modern phone cameras have high resolution now and can take excellent photos compared to just a few years ago. There is always a lit if talk about fake pics and the ladies who steal pics from the internet are the worst offenders, but to me a real picture of someone that is photoshopped or heavily airbrushed is almost as bad. Even lighting and makeup the pros use can completely change a look.  I do think it is ok to blur faces and photoshop tattoos for discretion but they should be mentioned so there is no surprise.

My taste is for natural beauty, gnd, casual types anyway. I don't go for the glamour model types, so that is another reason for my preference in photos.

professional pictures as long as they are not touched up too much.

However, sometimes professional pictures can be misleading and are not always a 'better' representation of the lady.

There's this one lady who looked a LOT better in person (or should I say tv episode) without the touch ups.
I won't say who, but it definitely sealed the deal for me in wanting to book in the future.

Pro or non pro - haven't we all seen this blog before?


Of course guys prefer non-professional images. Sure the pro ones are pretty and nice to look at but they know that they are a facade of the person who will visit.

Non-pro pics can be just as bad or worse. Say a provider got chunky and is posing in ways to hide that... She would do the same in a pro shoot as she would in a non-pro photo so the pro/non-pro case would be moot.

The bottom line is some ladies represent themselves accurately and others don't.

I highly recommend gents go to M&Gs to see who represents themselves in person to your liking. I am constantly told my images represent me so I seem older than when I am met in person and others say that my pics are too general. Everyone has a preference and all you can do is try different things to ensure you are marketing yourself to the best of your ability and to the accurate standard that highly rates ladies should hold.

My pro pics are untouched, all it takes is a great light and good cameraman!

...there's a good reference.
To me the important things are:
well lit
well composed
picture large enough to see (hate those postage stamp sized pictures)
comfortable pose
nothing extreme
looking natural
happy about it (fun)

Taking pictures is an art and not every one hast the skill
A pro is ok if they don't over-do it but a trusted friend can be just as good.

A photo is a communication between you and the viewer.
What are you saying in your pictures?

I want to see what you REALLY look like...

deception can be found everywhere...
Your photos are hot so keep doing what you're doing,