memorial weekend date with a provider ended up being a no show. a little bummed, because i went through hell to get there on time. learned a long time ago not to fret the small shit and especially not to get excited about things you can't control. i did leave a message on the providers voice mail though, indicating my disappointment. and you know what this classy provider did? she called back and apologized (i might add she did leave a message on my cell phone, which i didn't have at the time, postponing 20 minutes prior to my arrival). not only was her apology sincere she also offered a free appointment. now how's that for class?

which reminds me i never did hear from jennysue - where are you?  amazing how the cream floats to the top!

Hey times25, got a question for you. In your review of MistressM, you write, "All the while she rode me CG while using her hand to bring me to an unbelievable climax." Well that's all peaches and cream... but It certainly doen't substantiate the ranking you had given her, so... why did you give her an "eight" for performance? It does not make sense. She most certainly does not qualify by TER standards, since the mark is inconsistent with their designated conventions. Performances worthy of a grade of over "seven" must include... well you know. Moreover, given what MistressM offers, how can she even earn a "seven"? She offers nothing that qualifies her for such marks, so why do the hobbiests award her with them and rebuff the rules of the web site. Although the grade that you gave her was relatively high, I haven't singled you out intentionally. I am not trying to put you on the spot - others have violated this convention as well. I'm just wondering if there was a particular reason for your actions. That's all.

I'm flattered.

As I understand it, escorts are rated from 1-10 and I as a lowly FBSM & S&M (non BJ providing! non bisexual!) provider am only eligible to be rated from 1-7. Therefore you are correct, "7" is the top score I should receive.

Looking over my 43 reviews, 33 of these gentlemen gave me a performance score of "6" (4 people) or "7" (29 people). Only 10 rated me above the guidelines you are objecting to. I am not sure why you have singled me out, as there are half a dozen TER reviewed FBSM providers who have occasional ratings above 7's as well. Perhaps these men just happened to "click" with the provider in question and felt she went above and beyond the call of duty for her job description.

Then again, some people are rebels and just say what they feel in their hearts, even if it doesn't follow the "rules"! Maybe this was one of those times.

Or...maybe he just hit the wrong button when filling out my review!

MM


-- Modified on 5/28/2003 2:58:00 PM

no m i hit the right button. and while i find being labeled a rebel exciting - i'm far from that. actually i probably just felt great after seeing you and gave you a bonus. of course i seemed to have upset peckerhead and for that i apologize. i do live outside the rules occasionally and for that i offer no apology. once again m thanks for the great time and while it has been sometime since i posted that review - thank you too peckerhead, as i forgot what a wonderful time i had with m. and once again i apologize for exceeding the rating guidelines.

Times25, please take the time to contact TER in this matter. They can explain it better than I can. MistressM is not a FS provider. Therefore, her scores are not under the guidelines that you mentioned. It is my understanding that those guidelines are only for FS providers. I may be wrong, but I think that I have seen the powers that be mention this before.

No problem times. Now I understand - she is a massage provider, therefore the rules don't apply. Makes sense. I guess massage really means massage.

No offense Mistress M. I didn't mean to single you out. It's just that you have so many reviews with really high marks, yet you don't provide FS. I found this somewhat perplexing - that's all. Please accept my apology  M, as they say, if I put you on the spot and look at the upside - it's good publicity.

I can't say I recall seeing anything on the subject, but plain common sense dictates that it should be this way.  Escorts rated on an escort scale, Massage providers rated on a massage scale, etc.

that TER offers no guidelines for ratings of massage providers.  There are explicit guidelines for justifying numerical performance ratings above 7 for escorts, but ratings of massage providers are left to the whim of reviewers.

Bottom line, don't blame the reviewers.

....I'm sure that TER is open to any suggestions that you may have. It's easy to make the rating system for FS providers.I think it starts at 7. That is the highest score that can be had with standard services. The score can go up if the provider offers bb, greek,bfk,etc. Noe, if a massage only providers score was to start at 7, what would be required to bring it up? If no release is even offered, she is pretty muc deemed a rip-off.So, lets say a massage and HJ get's a 7. What should be required to get an 8,9 or 10? Remember that these are "massage only" providers. Good luck.