Occasionally I get scores that I don't like, but blow it off because YMMV applies to all of us.  However, thought I would toss this one out for a little speculation.  Take a look at Boscotops.......he is full of it.  Two other reviews on unreviewed girls.  Allies pic created this month......, I am truly not here to out other women, I care for the welfare of my sisters, but I would avoid this guy if I were you ladies......and make a note of the numbers on these pages.  It also appeared a couple days after my case got dismissed, he he.

((HUGZ))

Jenni

First, may I clarify what our subject matter is?  I read boscoTops' review as you suggested.  The narrative doesn't seem that bad, frankly.  By 'bogus', do you mean 'inexplicably low' numerics?  If so, I'll suggest an explanation below.  On the other hand, if 'bogus' indicates you've never seen this guy, then I'm convinced Staff will delete the offending review as soon as you make them aware of it.  The sooner the better.

The numbers in themselves, in the context of all your exceptional reviews, are clearly out of line.  Why the 5's?  It's most likely the age issue.  Clearly, he chose a 40-something provider when he really desired a 20-something provider.  Drat the luck!  Always struggled with math myself....

I wondered, is it possible he's fighting the "good fight" against "ratings inflation"?  I had my answer in a snap when I looked at the other reviews you mentioned:  No.  His castigation of others betrays a vindictive streak.  His syntax and writing style reveal other details as well, but this isn't a personal attack.  I would simply urge fair-minded readers to compare his comments with those, directly on point, by Fortitude (link below) and Orthodox ("Reviews, my pet peeve" thread), among others.  'Nuff said.  Highly recommend additional perspective available in calmbreeze's post on the "No more reviews from me...ever" thread.

Good call not letting boscoTops CIM.  Roundly appreciated by all who are to follow or swallow

Is this to say Allie is a donut eater?
-confused

Not to be paranoid but isn't "Bosco" the name of the cop on Third Watch?

or, I think Bosco means "woods" in Italian.  LOL, ok.  I'll shuddup now.

I agree that this guys review numbers do not correlate to the scoring system set up by Staff.

But it is not a bogus review, (unless it never happened at all), merely a low-baller (no pun intended) who doesn't seem to want to give credit where it is due.

As far as age goes, I don't believe that a 21 year old is automatically rated higher than a 41 year old.   I know a couple of girls over 40 that rate 8's and 9's, but that is where YMMV applies.  It would be nice if TER had a third category in which providers could be rated for how much class they have.  This would certainly work to give a better description of what a provider is like in person.

I have never seen you Jenni so I am not qualified to rate your appearance, but based on the review, I would say you rated a 7 for performance.  If he had gotten the extra service he wanted, it would have been an 8 or 9.

Along with ignoring the lowballers, it is only fair to ignore the highballers as well.   The review right before this guy rated you as a phenomenal 10/10, yet none of the extra point services were discussed.  That particular guy has a history of giving out 10s liberally so you have to consider the source.  But it sounded like you are a 10 in the class category.

When averaging out your ratings, these two reviews turn into a couple of 7.5s, which is pretty close to her typical average.

So Jenni, how about we just ignore these two reviews and be happy your case got dismissed......(smiles).

Now THAT is good news.

I don't agree entirely with you, U Cum. Although you may be right about the rationale related to BoscoTops' rating for Jenni's appearence (which I personally think BoscoTops needs either a more realistic perspective or a new seeing eye dog because Jenni is not a "5"), I think BoscTops rating for her performance is suspect. I don't know what BoscoTops was expecting, but Jenni performance is no "5," not even on a bad day. If one was to look at her past performance, you owuld see that the "5" looks way out of place. In fact, it seems as if it was a "spite" rating for not allowing him to CIM!!

I never saw this asshole is what I meant by "Bogus".  The numbers don't have anything to do with this post.  This guy is either writing for free VIP or he is one of our super stealth LE detectives building confidence.......my post was only meant to not allow this idiot to use MY reviews for reference.  I tried to PM him to remember who he is.  No reply.  Occassionally one will get less performance from me due to funky hygeine.  That is not the case here.  When I said take a look at the numbers on the web pages of the other two providers Boscotops reviewed, I just meant to note them.  They may or may not be safe.  I don't know if they are ligit girls or not.  But Allies pics were created on 9/8/03 according to the properties.  And I have reported him to staff.

-- Modified on 9/9/2003 2:27:06 PM

You're the best!

Elise [email protected]

IF you don't want to take heed of her warning, no problem.  She isn't the type to care about one reviewer that marks her low here or there.

She IS the type of woman to care about other issues that pop up on occassion, especially if they try to use her good name in their attempts to make it seem like they're one of the good boys rather than one of the BAD BOYS...

so WHATCHA GONNA DO?

She laid out all the possibilities, didn't hold back for two months while this guy laid out his web, (if that's indeed what it is) waiting to get confirmation and verification.  Immediately brought it to all of our attention so we can judge for ourselves.  Very respectable lady in my never humble opinion.

Elise  [email protected]

-- Modified on 9/9/2003 9:05:25 PM

There is a very slight possability that I did. But I don't think so. Occassionally I do reveal my age to people.  But then Detective Bonafide lover know's my age too.  I have a pretty good memory. And it got even better last March when I got in trouble.  I didn't pay much attention for a couple of days, but when I decided to visit his other reviews I began to question.  Plus he never answered my PM. Which I considered perhaps he didn't want to.  Maybe I just wasn't his type, cup of tea, whatever.  I respect everyone's opinion.  I know I am not the most beautiful what the f ever for everyone.  But his handle has my attention and his history.  He wrote a new one on Farrah Foxxx.  I just think he is freakin full of shit and thought I could say so.  He is welcomed to add to this post.

this young ladie states her opinion and everybody seems to be spazzing out. i am grateful that this beauty has the balls to say something--thank you very much. right or wrong i appreciate someone trying to help.

Honestly I don't know what "u_cum_1st" is talking about. I have read and reread his post and he seems to be using some circuitous "logic" to make some inexplicable point.


He seems to have some explanation for the low numbers that are clearly out of line with Jenni's well reviewed, very respectable numbers and then seems to reverse course and acknowledge the numbers are out of line but then suggests that perhaps the reviewer is fighting the good fight against ratings inflation. He seems to conclude that "No" this is not what the reviewer is doing but "plants the seed" anyway. He indicates the reviewer betrays a vindictive streak but in the next sentence concludes it isn't a personal attack. What the heck is that about? He's all over the map and a bit suspect to say the least.

Jenni is quite capable of handling herself very well. Yes she cares about the welfare and safety of her "sisters".

Although I've never reviewed her she's a 10 for me because it isn't simply appearance or performance although on both counts she is exceptional. It goes beyond that to character and integrity and that oft overlooked trait personality.

I simply love being in her presence and sharing her company even if only for a short time.

Thanks Jenni for being who you are and trying to look out for
the welfare of others.


-- Modified on 9/9/2003 9:18:29 PM

-- Modified on 9/10/2003 8:21:24 PM

....Jenni was saying that it was a completely fabricated review.
It just proves that with enough practice, even LE can learn how to write a fake review for their free membership.  It is truly up to the providers to spot the ones that are fabrications.  Jenni came through like a champ and I am sorry that I misinterpreted her post.

It was one of those posts that would have been better not to send (but at the time it made so much sense).

I empathize with her regarding the harassment and applaud her resilience in the face of such bullshit behavior.  

Sorry Hon!

to yank that review?

I appreciate your honesty and integrity.  One purpose of these boards is to talk things out.  Let me see if I correctly understand where this thread had gone:  It would take skilled Hollywood make-up artists many hours to downgrade your appearance to a "5".  Your performance could theoretically peg below an 8 IF the gent smelled like 10-year old carpet in a men’s locker room.  HOWEVER, after searching your memory, discussing the issue among friends, and (responsibly) PM’ing the dude to no avail, you are honestly quite sure you’ve never seen him and that his review is totally false.  

No one who has seen you or read your reviews could think otherwise.  So, shouldn’t you request that Staff remove the fake review?  The consensus of this thread, I think, is that it violated the honesty clause of Paragraph 2 of TER review policy (link).  

I don’t know what to make of his other 2 reviews and the new-ness of one provider’s profile/pic.  Frankly, I’m too new myself to grasp all the nuances of the hobby...  FWIW, I did search on other boards to get bearing and speed on boscoTops.  He has many posts on the Legal Corner although I didn’t see that cut one way or t'other.

Peace.

Amen, she is one of a kind.

-- Modified on 9/10/2003 7:46:25 AM

Jenni...so glad to hear that your case was dismissed. It really didn't sound like they had much of a case anyway. Sorry you had to go through all the hassle. Oh well...maybe a little wiser for the experience? Keep up the stringent screening, and don't apologize for it. You ladies take a lot of risks, keep it as safe as you can. For those of you who don't know Jenni, she is one of the best ladies around (in or out of the business). Do yourself a favor and give her a call. And Jenni, I haven't forgotten about our TJ run, still interested?

The picture you saw may be new, but Allie's ad on sdadultdirectory has been up forever.  Seems she's an agency girl with Westcoastescorts.net.  She's also on that website.

Scarlet has the same phone no. as two other providers (yea google!).  I suspect a bait and switch agency.  

So the PROBABILITY is that neither girl is part of the "legion of doom" as supergirl would put it.

Of course I've got no clue whether or not boscoTops ever actually saw either of them.  That's the beauty of reviewing bait & switch if you want to post a fake review.  You're not likely ever to be called on it.

invaded her place and are wanting to picnic in the living room and I would only have these questions:

What time can I come over? And do you know if they like red wine, or white?

I agree with apuser.  The way I look at a lady's rating is, I ignore both the high and low ratings in both performance and looks, unless there is a large number of them, the average the rest.  That said, if there is a lare number of ratings (either high or low) that says a lot about the provider.  If you see a lot of 8s and 9s, some 5s and a 2 for example, I just ignore all of the low ratings.  Same on the other end of the scale too.
Hope this helps some newbies.

Boscotops should answer up to Jenni on this count.

The mature providers aren't the type to go off all half cocked on one review for the same reason that you just described.

Miss Jenni has excellent reason that she's laid out here for wanting Boscotop to come forward to her and just let her know that he did indeed spend some time with her.  That's easily done via PM.  She isn't the type to go crazy and call up work, home numbers and go nutso simply for a not so nice review like some young, silly provider that's worried about numbers. She cares about other, more significant deals. Trust the girls on this point!

If Bosco didn't spend time with her, what would his motive be for writing three reviews? Well, of course, the free VIP.  

Lots of shmucks want Free VIP, but so do the BAD BOYS.  They want free VIP so that the fifth or sixth girl or tenth girl down the line that they review, THE BAD GIRL, (the one that comes with free metal bracelets and free ride downtown with a period of free lodging) will blend right in with the others.

They want free VIP so that when they ask fishing expedition questions, you all will answer up.

They want free VIP so that the budget they work with will remain intact.

I could have written about any SDCenterfolds girl without having called her out for a session, that she was bait and switch and that her number came up in a search under four or however many other names.  Why didn't Bosco do that same search BEFORE calling the lady and spending his supposedly hard earned cash if he's a civilian?

Sometimes thinking in maybes and possibilities will keep your hind end from sitting in a place where there isn't FREEDOM to move about as you wish.

Again, you get to judge for yourself when it's laid out there for you.  Kudos to Jenni for bringing it to all of our attention, and...

BOSCO, hope you do clear this up.  Jenni is very mature and she'll most certainly post that retraction when you remind her exactly who you are and where and when it was you spent that time together!  You're always welcome your opinion on the time spent, so don't sweat those review numbers.. she isn't that type of lady!  If you indeed spent time together I've no doubt she'll apologize and you'll be the board's newest hero for taking the public beating!

Back to lunch.. I can pinch a damn inch now!! EEEK!

Elise  [email protected]

-- Modified on 9/11/2003 12:30:47 PM