Agreed.  If a girl has lots of freckles, don't photoshop them out.  If a girl has stretchmarks or cellulite, don't photoshop them away.  And if a girl has tattoos, don't erase them in photoshop.  (The exception is the provider who does not show her face, and wants to hide tattoos so that she cannot be identified by them with Uncle Leo.  In this case, I see no problem with her photoshopping out the tattoos, but adding a note in her Ad with a general description of the size and location of the ink, so gents aren't fooled into thinking she's ink-free.  Of course, I'd never book a girl who didn't show her face anyway, but I'm just sayin', if I was open to booking a girl w/o face pics, I would not have a problem with her hiding her tatts, as long as she tipped me off to their existence and coverage size and area.)

Matt

ps~There's a provider who advertises on another site, the most blatantly photoshopped photos I've ever seen posted by a provider.  She slims her body down, smooths the skin on her face, and erases all her freckles.  What boggles my mind, is that one day another provider posted pics from a recent party and I saw this girl untouched by photoshop...and she was adorable!  Gorgeous, I might even say.  Okay, not a total hardbody like her tampered-with photos would suggest, but still, very GND hot.  

So mila, this reminds me of a suggestion I have for Ads.  Mix it up a bit between pro pics (un-tampered-with), and casual non-pro shots (as long as they're not too grainy and/or poorly lit).  The guys I know like seeing both (not necessarily in the same Ad), but if they had to choose just one type, they'd choose the non-pro pics.