The way I look at it is.....it all depends on the the hobby board that *the hobbyist reviews the lady on* and the layout of their review format.
For example: TER review format stays as is for the provider, from the very 1st review she gets (IE: the rates, description etc). (thus making it her TER profile)...wherein each review thereafter is connected to her *profile* (her first TER review)
The only thing that changes in every review is the actual written verbiage of the *fantasy* that took place by each reviewer.
So on a TER review, if she has 2-10000....reviews.. the mere mention of the * discounted rate he paid* in the *body of the fantasy review is pointless. JMHO.
NOW, if said hobbyist reviews her on a different hobby site and thus the review format is individualized and not lumped together like TER's review format.
Then YES, in the donation box, the hobbyist ought to indicate that *he partook of xyz special for said allotted time frame*
It not only shows that said provider offered a *special* during said week etc. BUT it shows that she HONORED said special.
BUT it's up to the hobbyist when noting it in a review, that he be precise about *the special* so that most hobbyist don't take advantage of her low rate from there on out.
AND it's up to the provider as well, to be damn precise to how her special works (when it starts and stops etc).
jmho
Posted By: GoldieKnox
Ladies,
Gentlemen,
People of the world...
When a hobbyist sees somebody and they get a discount on their date shouldn't that be mentioned in the review? I mean, if the rate is normally 500 and you see her for 400 shouldn't that be mentioned in the recount of the experience? I think it would affect the readers opinion of how the scores were tallied... For example if the rate was higher would they have felt it worth it as much?
Another question: specials.
If the ad title says "special" in it should the provider not post what that special might be?
Feedback is welcome. Trolls are not.
Thanks,
Goldie