A visiting provider named Kristina appears to be, in my opinion based on her website pics, a definite 8-10 in appearance.  Her profile says the pics are of her and are accurate, but the five or six reviewers rate her 5-7 in appearance.

She apparently is gone as of tonight, so there is no opportunity to do further research.  But I'm just curious as to the discrepancy and what others may think.

Ok, so what is your point?

We have already  discussed the fact that she used glamour shots instead of normal pictures on her website photos because she thought she was competing with the best known SD escort, namely Bridgette.  She had no clue that she was a ripoff.  She is planning on adding a normal photo of herself in the near future.

The difference in appearance is the same as one would expect when you have a professional studio makeup artist, lighting, and lingerie, versus a friend with a digital camera in your living room.

...I have to agree, her pictures look great.  But I've met many well know actresses and models and can attest that one can do a lot with lighting, make-up and wardrobe.

My opinion, is that the photos'a are not even her. I saw her, and I just can't believe that's her in the photos.

that if a provider goes to such lengths to depict herself as "model material" but does not come across as such in person, why should we be saying "Yes" to the question "Are the photos accurate?"

If I had visited this provider expecting to see the girl in the photos, without having had the benefit of seeing prior reviews, I would have come away somewhat disappointed, and certainly would not have answered "Yes" to that question on the review form.

That's my take too just based on reading the reviews.

The answer "Yes" to the question "Are the photos accurate" because the review (or first review) is fake. Whatever was put in there by the first who post the review will stay.

When viewing the provider's profile, click on "Report a Problem" and let them know what should be changed.

...why not do the same for clients?  That's false advertising in my book.  She might as well be wearing falsies!

Her in person appearance is so different from her pics, that they may as well be 2 different people. If she returns, she had better put up some current photographs that are accurate. I was very let down when i walked in and took a good look at her. I kept thinking," This can't be the same girl that I saw on the web.".
  I expect such schemes from Ashley and the like, but not from an out of towner who is trying to get a good base of clients for future visits. Maybe she won't be back. Oh well.

I'll send her your complaints as she doesn't read this discussion group yet.  I am sure she is willing to play by our rules.  She'll be back again in a month or two.