Just looking at some reviews and I see that Candra has 22 pages (WOW) of reviews. Is there anything left to be said about her and are there any providers who have more reviews then her?

They don't want years and years worth so they remove them.

Well...I was seeing Candra and Cinders before they even went on the internet.  I've even been top Candra's home albeit many years ago. They used their real names then.  So it doesn't surprise me.  They're two of the best you'll ever meet.

This is a business.  There are 365 days in a year.  If you are in it for any length of time and are any good, you will have alot of customers.  Remember, Cyber, you are not special, and the ladies are not sitting by the phone waiting for your call.

If Candra is still getting the scores she does after seeing so many customers, she should be congradulated, not questioned.  In addition, think of how many guys she has made happy...I mean, that is the highest form of service a provider can offer.  If she is still able to give as she does and not be bored with us lonely, sex starved men, then she is one helluva woman.

so with a lady as professional as andra seems to be from her reviews, I doubt you will know you aren't her first.

Now as for you, Spark, I never knew you were so open minded... :P

As I said in another post, I was seeing her over 10 years ago.  I saw her again a few month ago and shei is still as nice and sensual as ever.  She really is quite a lady!

In answer to your two questions 1. The deep well of Candra's skills and charms can't be fully plumbed or encompassed by our sorry efforts at wordsmithing. So, word on and worry not about running out of things to say, for her charms exhaust any attempts we make to fully explain or capture them with words. 2. No other SD provider has as many reviews, but Suzanne has a much higher rate (reviews/time), and Diana and BarbyLuv have an equal rate. It should be noted that with these four providers the high rates of reviews are accompanied by ratings that are at the top of the SD hierarchy. It seems the the high rate of reviews equates to a high rate of client satisfaction, so don't let the numbers deter you.

Not to worry, it won't wear out. I'll paraphrase the old bard, Shakespeare.  
Numbers cannot wither her,
Nor custom stale her infinite variety.
Other women cloy the appetites they feed,
But she makes hungry what she satisfies most.

I have reviewed the high number providers over the country, and have found that their ratings were consistently high.
This shouldn't come as a surprise, because good providers attract more clients than the poor, we men are inclined to report our good experiences rather than expose our poor judgement in choosing the losers, and good providers prevail while the losers soon waft into oblivion. Another finding was that the latter reviews of the highly reviewed providers invariably were better than their earlier reviews. Remember that experience finely tuned and aptly applied triumphs.

I know I am not special and I know they are not sitting by the phone waiting for my call... I am not that naive bud. But cmon, is it only me that find it disgusting to have 22 pages of reviews? seriously! It's disgusting and riskier! and I wouldnt see her with your money!

necessarily a barometer of how many guys a woman has been with.  I was going to say if the # of reviews is a concern to you, you should stick to the 18 year olds who have just started in the biz (maybe you do).  However, there are many girls of that age who have had quite a number of guys, potentially bareback, before they decided that this was a good way to make a living, and who are, unbeknownst to you, more risky because of that than someone like Candra.  At least with a woman who has been in the biz for a while, you have some confidence that she has been using condoms for quite some time (with possible exception of an SO, if she has one), at least for intercourse.

Oh well, to each his own.  My point is that "few reviews" is a false sense of security on your part if your concern is disease.

That's your loss, not ours! (eom)

-- Modified on 11/3/2003 3:33:19 PM