Either this review is complete and utter BS, or Natalie has taken up extended services and could become the busiest provider in Sandyeggo.  Let's take a vote...

It amazes me that some are shelling out 5 bones for a massage and toy show. Now this guy "goes yard"??? Don't think so.

Why are you so sure this never happened?  She is massage only for most guys I'm sure, but you don't think once in a while (a good day, a hot guy, whatever), a guy gets more than a massage?  

Granted that if this really happened it is not nice of him to brag about it in a review.

actually it's happeneed to me on a several occasions - it's called ymmv. i've never included it in a review and actually seldom post any reviews anymore unless asked too. one has to question the reviewer though, with only one review? i'm not sure it warranted a report, but whatever makes people happy is good with me!

Considering her history, I believe that the review is nothing more than a tall tale. Although I doubt it, it's possible it was put there to drum up business. It would not be the first time that this type of thing has happened. Let's just wait and see if any other reviewers have as much luck as this guy allegedly did. Kind of pricey though.

a review like this creates problems for both the hobbyist and the provider.  If it's false, then the provider is in for a number of very unwanted advances. Those who have been around a while are likely to remember any number of threads where a hobbyist has printed out a review to show a provider expecting the same. The hobbyists who are making the advances based on a review like that are in for a potentially very disappointing session with unmet expectations, and then create a negatively slanted review based on that session.  Which is entirely unfair to the provider since her level of service hadn’t changed, only someone’s level of expectation.

The reason to bring this up in the first place is to highlight an unusual exception to the known norm of this provider.  If it’s false, it will be removed and hopefully not create more difficulties for this provider than it might have already.  If it’s true, then the line starts behind me!  

Isn't it funny how these "one review wonderboys" always seem to coax so much more services out of a up-to-this-point limited services provider than a whole bunch of well-known hobbyists who have a solid track record of past reviews.

Of course, if Delta88 is indeed correct, then we better quickly step aside for the upcoming stampede.