It would certainly be interesting, but TER would have to start a whole separate database of male providers.  I think a separate site would serve the purpose better.

If you're gay or bi (hey, you haven't told us anything) then you'd be reviewing some of the same providers we see.  Now that would really be interesting.  But it's not my job to think through all the ramifications so I'll defer to whatever Staff decides.

Good luck though.  And prepare to be bombarded by wannabe male volunteers.

and how are the TS clients classified?  gender of client of such services should not matter.  I've thought of myself as a lesbian for a while now...  ssshhhhhhh

ok, so how about providers who work with other providers?  should they be able to act as "clients" and review?  probably not as they are not the one's requesting the service.  that's more of a peer-to-peer review and boards such as naughtyescort provide that type of dialog.

the big No-NO is providers writing reviews of themself or of other providers.  Have I told you what a stud I am recently?  ok, just kidding but you get the idea.

and hey, unless you self-identify yourself as a female, you probably wouldn't get caught and outed.  your reviews would have to be extremely generic, "uh, we kissed, there was some licking and sucking, and oh my what an O.  LOTS of POSITIONS!!!"  but what good would such generalities add to the reviews?  none.

so YES absolutely yes, all clients of all providers should be allowed to review.  I, for one, would welcome a female perspective, if not overt discussion, of this avocation.

cheers, fahrkle

ps:  Sedona, if you're reading this, I miss your musings!

ps2:  if anything, TER should list the Providers who have requested NO REVIEWS.  This would help resolve lots of ISO type questions and at least place those Providers on the known Map.